Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39703564›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025

Benefit from dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: subgroup analyses from the randomised phase 3 PANTHER trial.

Alexios Matikas, Andri Papakonstantinou, Sibylle Loibl, Günther G Steger, Michael Untch, Hemming Johansson, Nikos Tsiknakis, Mats Hellström, Richard Greil, Volker Möbus and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00798070 (A Randomised Phase 3 Study Comparing Biweekly and Tailored Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed by Biweekly Tailored Docetaxel Versus Three Weekly Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide + 5-fluorouracil Followed by Docetaxel in Lymph Node Positive or High Risk Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00798070 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Randomised Phase 3 Study Comparing Biweekly and Tailored Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed by Biweekly Tailored Docetaxel Versus Three Weekly Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide + 5-fluorouracil Followed by Docetaxel in Lymph Node Positive or High Risk Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska University HospitalRan2007 to 2028Enrolled2,017ConditionsBreast CancerArmsdtEC→dtT, FEC→T
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Mapping supportive-care evidence for febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer chemotherapy: a bibliometric analysis of long-acting G-CSF prophylaxis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alexios MatikasKarolinska Institutet, Oncology/Pathology Department, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andri PapakonstantinouKarolinska Institutet, Oncology/Pathology Department, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sibylle LoiblGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Günther G StegerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael UntchHelios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.
Hemming JohanssonKarolinska Institutet, Oncology/Pathology Department, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nikos TsiknakisKarolinska Institutet, Oncology/Pathology Department, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mats HellströmBreast Center, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Stockholm, Sweden.
Richard Greil3rd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg Austria, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute and AGMT, Salzburg, Austria.
Volker MöbusDepartment of Medicine II, Hematology & Oncology University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Michael GnantComprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jonas BerghKarolinska Institutet, Oncology/Pathology Department, Stockholm, Sweden.
Theodoros FoukakisKarolinska Institutet, Oncology/Pathology Department, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It is unclear whether some patients with high-risk breast cancer do not warrant adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy due to small expected absolute benefit. Methods: The phase 3 PANTHER trial (NCT00798070) compared adjuvant sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and docetaxel (D) administered in either tailored dose-dense (tDD EC/D) or standard interval schedule (FEC/D) to patients with high-risk resected early breast cancer (n = 2003). We compared outcomes across key subgroups of interest, evaluated the performance of the online prognostication and treatment benefit estimation tool PREDICT and conducted a subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP) analysis. Primary endpoint was breast cancer recurrence free survival (BCRFS). Findings: Median follow-up was 10.3 years. Treatment with tDD EC/D improved 10-year BCRFS across all subgroups including according to menopausal status, with an absolute benefit of 2% or more, as well as in luminal (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.83, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.65-1.05) and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) positive (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.93), but not triple negative breast cancer patients (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.66-1.57). PREDICT underestimated overall survival in the entire population and across all subgroups. In STEPP analysis, absolute benefit from tDD EC/D in BCRFS was stable across risk-defined subpopulations, from 3.8% in the lowest risk patients to 3.6% in the highest risk ones. There was no differential treatment effect over time. Interpretation: We could not reliably identify any subgroup not benefiting from dose-dense treatment, which should be considered for patients with primary resected high-risk breast cancer. Funding: Cancerfonden, Bröstcancerförbundet, Radiumhemmets Forskningsfonder, Amgen, Roche, sanofi-aventis.

Indexed as

Adjuvant chemotherapyAmenorrheaBreast cancerDose-densePREDICTSTEPP

Identifiers

PMID39703564
PMCPMC11652897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.