ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
Benefit from dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: subgroup analyses from the randomised phase 3 PANTHER trial.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00798070 (A Randomised Phase 3 Study Comparing Biweekly and Tailored Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed by Biweekly Tailored Docetaxel Versus Three Weekly Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide + 5-fluorouracil Followed by Docetaxel in Lymph Node Positive or High Risk Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised Phase 3 Study Comparing Biweekly and Tailored Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed by Biweekly Tailored Docetaxel Versus Three Weekly Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide + 5-fluorouracil Followed by Docetaxel in Lymph Node Positive or High Risk Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancer Patients
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Systemic treatment of breast cancer: professional guideline].Magyar onkologia · 2025Guideline
- Neoadjuvant Taxane Plus Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab With or Without Carboplatin in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer: The Randomized Noninferiority Phase III neoCARHP Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Trial
- Mapping supportive-care evidence for febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer chemotherapy: a bibliometric analysis of long-acting G-CSF prophylaxis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Prevalence and prognosis of patients with breast cancer eligible for adjuvant abemaciclib or ribociclib: a nationwide population-based study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Real Clinical Data and Literature Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Patient characteristics associated with conventional schedule vs. dose dense chemotherapy in women with stage I-IIIA breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk early breast cancer: its role in the era of personalised oncology.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Dose-dense anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy remains the preferred treatment for selected patients with high-risk early breast cancer.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: It is unclear whether some patients with high-risk breast cancer do not warrant adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy due to small expected absolute benefit. Methods: The phase 3 PANTHER trial (NCT00798070) compared adjuvant sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and docetaxel (D) administered in either tailored dose-dense (tDD EC/D) or standard interval schedule (FEC/D) to patients with high-risk resected early breast cancer (n = 2003). We compared outcomes across key subgroups of interest, evaluated the performance of the online prognostication and treatment benefit estimation tool PREDICT and conducted a subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP) analysis. Primary endpoint was breast cancer recurrence free survival (BCRFS). Findings: Median follow-up was 10.3 years. Treatment with tDD EC/D improved 10-year BCRFS across all subgroups including according to menopausal status, with an absolute benefit of 2% or more, as well as in luminal (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.83, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.65-1.05) and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) positive (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.93), but not triple negative breast cancer patients (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.66-1.57). PREDICT underestimated overall survival in the entire population and across all subgroups. In STEPP analysis, absolute benefit from tDD EC/D in BCRFS was stable across risk-defined subpopulations, from 3.8% in the lowest risk patients to 3.6% in the highest risk ones. There was no differential treatment effect over time. Interpretation: We could not reliably identify any subgroup not benefiting from dose-dense treatment, which should be considered for patients with primary resected high-risk breast cancer. Funding: Cancerfonden, Bröstcancerförbundet, Radiumhemmets Forskningsfonder, Amgen, Roche, sanofi-aventis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.