Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39703563›Full record

ArticleNature machine intelligence2024

An interpretable RNA foundation model for exploring functional RNA motifs in plants.

Haopeng Yu, Heng Yang, Wenqing Sun, Zongyun Yan, Xiaofei Yang, Huakun Zhang, Yiliang Ding, Ke Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature machine intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Which chemical features are captured by ChemBERTa's attention?Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. RNA regulation in plants.Science China. Life sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. From Structure to Function of Promoters and 5'UTRs in Maize.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haopeng Yu *Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.
Heng Yang *Department of Computer Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6831-196X
Wenqing Sun *Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.
Zongyun Yan *Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Xiaofei YangNational Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5204-1769
Huakun ZhangKey Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.
Yiliang DingDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4161-6365
Ke LiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7200-4244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complex 'language' of plant RNA encodes a vast array of biological regulatory elements that orchestrate crucial aspects of plant growth, development and adaptation to environmental stresses. Recent advancements in foundation models (FMs) have demonstrated their unprecedented potential to decipher complex 'language' in biology. In this study, we introduced PlantRNA-FM, a high-performance and interpretable RNA FM specifically designed for plants. PlantRNA-FM was pretrained on an extensive dataset, integrating RNA sequences and RNA structure information from 1,124 distinct plant species. PlantRNA-FM exhibits superior performance in plant-specific downstream tasks. PlantRNA-FM achieves an F1 score of 0.974 for genic region annotation, whereas the current best-performing model achieves 0.639. Our PlantRNA-FM is empowered by our interpretable framework that facilitates the identification of biologically functional RNA sequence and structure motifs, including both RNA secondary and tertiary structure motifs across transcriptomes. Through experimental validations, we revealed translation-associated RNA motifs in plants. Our PlantRNA-FM also highlighted the importance of the position information of these functional RNA motifs in genic regions. Taken together, our PlantRNA-FM facilitates the exploration of functional RNA motifs across the complexity of transcriptomes, empowering plant scientists with capabilities for programming RNA codes in plants.

Indexed as

Computational modelsMachine learningPlant molecular biology

Identifiers

PMID39703563
PMCPMC11652376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.