Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39703485›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Evaluating walkability across age groups and flooring materials using IMU sensors.

Daehwi Jo, Hyunsoo Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daehwi JoDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Hyunsoo KimDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a novel approach to quantitatively assess the impact of flooring materials on walkability using Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensors and Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) algorithm. Four common pavement materials (wood, asphalt, concrete block, and cement) were evaluated across five age groups (20-30, 30-40, 40-50, 50-60, and over 60 years) with 80 participants walking 1,200 m on each surface. IMU sensors attached to the lumbar region recorded acceleration and gyroscope data, which were then analyzed using DTW to quantify gait stability. Results showed significant differences in DTW values among materials, with wood exhibiting the lowest average DTW value (12.99 ± 3.05) indicating the most stable walking environment, while cement showed the highest (39.14 ± 9.74). In addition, age-related analysis revealed increasing DTW values with age across all materials, with the most pronounced effect in the older adult group. The methodology presented offers sensor-based approach for evaluating and optimizing pedestrian infrastructure in smart city development.

Indexed as

Floors and FloorcoveringsWalkingAccelerometryAdultAgedAge FactorsAlgorithmsConstruction MaterialsFemaleGaitHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultagedynamic time warpingfatigueflooring materialsIMU sensorswalkability

Identifiers

PMID39703485
PMCPMC11657239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.