ArticleNeurology. Genetics2025
Updated Structure of
Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unified long-read panel for Parkinson's and repeat expansion disorders.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- The novel (TCTG)Human genomics · 2026Article
- Patent foramen ovale diagnosis in young stroke patients: analysis of recurrence and mortality.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is a multisystemic repeat disorder caused by the expansion of an unstable CCTG tetranucleotide repeat in the noncoding region of the Methods: Our study reevaluated 80 patients (cohort 1) with clinical suspicion of DM2 but homozygous negative results using the standard diagnostic repeat-primed PCR (RP-PCR). Reanalysis was performed using a second RP-PCR that amplifies the repeat from the opposite direction. Individual samples were further analyzed by Oxford Nanopore Technology long-read sequencing, Sanger sequencing, and another RP-PCR. In addition, repeat expansions were further characterized in 168 patients with confirmed DM2 (cohort 2). Results: We identified 5 of the 80 patients (cohort 1) with expanded repeats in Discussion: Our study revealed the presence of an additional repeat (TCTG)
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.