ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2024
Psychometric evaluation and adaptation of the COMICE questionnaire for Swedish midwifery students.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe world needs skilled, well educated, and confident midwives, but there is a lack of instruments to measure confidence in the Swedish context. The aim was to psychometrically test and adapt the COMICE (Confidence Of Midwifery students on selected midwifery Competencies at completion of Education) questionnaire on Swedish midwifery students.
methodsThis is a national cross-sectional study of midwifery students from all 13 universities in Sweden in 2016-2017. The questionnaire comprised antenatal, intrapartum, postpartum and newborn care and underwent a principal component analysis. Analysis of variance was used to study associations with students' background characteristics.
resultsA total of 238 students (78% response rate) completed the questionnaire. For antenatal care, two components were identified: performing routine midwifery assessments during pregnancy and identifying fetal and maternal risk factors while educating parents (KMO=0.895, p<0.001; Cronbach's alpha=0.848 and 0.827, respectively). For intrapartum care, three components emerged: managing physiological birth and providing support, managing complicated labor and birth, and identifying and providing lifesaving measures (KMO=0.905, p<0.001; Cronbach's alpha=0.917, 0.809, and 0.777, respectively). Postnatal and newborn care included managing uncomplicated care while educating parents and managing complications (KMO=0.941, p<0.001; Cronbach's alpha=0.993 and 0.558, respectively). Younger students (<31 years) reported greater confidence in routine antenatal assessments compared to older students (mean: 27.43 vs 26.01, p=0.004), managing physiological births (mean: 65.41 vs 62.85, p=0.01), and handling complicated labors (mean: 20.37 vs 19.05, p=0.046).
conclusionsThis study supports the Swedish version of the COMICE questionnaire as a tool to measure confidence among midwifery students in a Swedish context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.