ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2024
A qualitative study of bereaved parents and healthcare professionals on perinatal loss.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurses' and midwives' experiences of supporting parents following perinatal bereavement: A qualitative systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Psychotherapeutic Interventions and Psychosocial Outcomes Following Perinatal Loss: An Umbrella Review with a Patient-Centered Care Perspective.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exploring challenges and opportunities in paediatric bereavement care: a qualitative study from a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Perinatal bereavement rooms: a narrative review of physical space in perinatal grief.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPerinatal loss, encompassing stillbirth and neonatal death, can have profound physical and psychological consequences for parents. Effective communication by healthcare professionals during this sensitive period is critical. This study aimed to explore how bereaved parents and professionals experienced verbal and non-verbal communication during perinatal loss.
methodsA qualitative, in-depth interview study following grounded theory principles was conducted in Flanders, Belgium, between January and June 2021. Participants were purposively selected via a hospital ward. Face-to-face (n=8) and online (n=13) interviews were carried out by two midwife researchers who were aware of potential biases related to personal/professional interests. A group of bereaved parents and professionals provided feedback during the project. Qualitative analysis was conducted using NVIVO, employing open and axial coding to identify themes.
resultsEleven bereaved parents and ten professionals participated. Six themes emerged: 1) navigating time and adjusting pace; 2) recognition of parenthood in woman and partner; 3) clear, honest information for shared decision-making; 4) authentic contact while leaving room for alone time; 5) gentle and sensitive verbal communication; and 6) professionals' self-care. Parents valued clear, honest communication, acknowledgment of their parenthood, and the ability to make informed decisions. Healthcare professionals emphasized the challenge of providing adequate time and presence amidst busy schedules, but recognized the importance of empathy and sensitivity.
conclusionsCompassionate, patient-centered care with effective verbal and non-verbal communication is vital in supporting bereaved parents during perinatal loss, and it continues to be a challenge. Findings can guide clinical practice to inform professional training initiatives and inform intervention development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.