ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024
Exploring transcription modalities from bimodal, single-cell RNA sequencing data.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gli1⁺ cell aggregates promote type H vessel formation and orchestrate bone defect regeneration.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a growing interest in generating bimodal, single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data for studying biological pathways. These data are predominantly utilized in understanding phenotypic trajectories using RNA velocities; however, the shape information encoded in the two-dimensional resolution of such data is not yet exploited. In this paper, we present an elliptical parametrization of two-dimensional RNA-seq data, from which we derived statistics that reveal four different modalities. These modalities can be interpreted as manifestations of the changes in the rates of splicing, transcription or degradation. We performed our analysis on a cell cycle and a colorectal cancer dataset. In both datasets, we found genes that are not picked up by differential gene expression analysis (DGEA), and are consequently unnoticed, yet visibly delineate phenotypes. This indicates that, in addition to DGEA, searching for genes that exhibit the discovered modalities could aid recovering genes that set phenotypes apart. For communities studying biomarkers and cellular phenotyping, the modalities present in bimodal RNA-seq data broaden the search space of genes, and furthermore, allow for incorporating cellular RNA processing into regulatory analyses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.