ArticleACS sustainable chemistry & engineering2024
Assessing Environmental and Economic Sustainability: Valorizing Grape Stems for Animal Feed Production.
Article in ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhibitory Effects of Grape Stem Extracts From Douro Varieties on Skin-Aging Enzymes: A Sustainable Source of Cosmeceutical Agents.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Article
- Grape Stalks as a Sustainable Feed Supplement for Dairy Cows: A Preliminary In Vivo Study on Milk Microbiota and Cheese Quality.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated an innovative strategy for valorizing grape stems (GS) from the winery industry as an animal feed ingredient from both environmental life-cycle and economic perspectives. Two processes for GS-based feed ingredient production were compared: one using hydrolyzed GS and the other using nonhydrolyzed GS, alongside the conventional animal feed production process. Using primary pilot-scale data for GS-based feed ingredient production and secondary data for animal feed production, life-cycle assessments, and economic analyses were conducted. Results showed that hydrolyzing GS leads to 3.8 times higher impacts on human health compared to the nonhydrolyzed variant, primarily due to NaOH and electricity usage, although this difference becomes negligible at the animal feed production stage. Incorporating GS-based feed ingredients was found to reduce the environmental impacts of animal feeds, primarily due to reductions in other ingredients. Economically, producing nonhydrolyzed GS-based feed ingredient proved more feasible, with a net present value of €-106,766 for a plant with a capacity of 1000 kg/d. GS valorization scenarios yield lower environmental impacts than landfilling and composting, although not compared to incineration, which offers notable energy recovery potential. This study suggests adopting GS valorization in animal husbandry to support a circular economy, providing insights for stakeholders.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.