ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Prenatal Spina Bifida Repair: A Survey of Current Practice in the United States.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in the prevention and prenatal treatment of spina bifida.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prenatal myelomeningocele (MMC) repair offers significant benefits over traditional postnatal repair, as demonstrated by the Management of Myelomeningocele Study trial. We characterize the current specialist involvement in prenatal and postnatal MMC repair. Methods: The top 50 US News Children's Hospitals for Neonatology and Neurology/Neurosurgery were queried, resulting in 67 unique hospitals. Specialties involved in MMC repair were extracted via hospital websites and surveys. Results: Among the 58 hospitals included, only 18 (31%) offered both prenatal and postnatal MMC repair, and the remaining 40 (69%) offered postnatal repair only. Of the 40 hospitals offering postnatal repair only, neurosurgeons (n = 38), orthopedic surgeons (n = 34), and urologists (n = 33) were most often included. Of the 18 hospitals with prenatal repair, neurosurgeons (n = 18) and maternal-fetal medicine specialists (n = 14) were most commonly involved. Prenatal teams had pediatric and fetal surgeons involved more often than postnatal teams ( Conclusions: These data emphasize both the delayed adaptation of fetal repair of MMC by major children's hospitals and lack of fellowship-trained specialists involved; only 31% of the major children's hospitals offer prenatal repair of MMC, with only 39% of those hospitals being led by a fellowship-trained fetal surgeon. These data highlight the need for additional teams trained in prenatal MMC repair as well as the standardization of fetal surgery fellowships to allow for the development of prenatal repair teams.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.