Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39703276›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

A Comparative Analysis of Nursing Care Needs Scores at Discharge and Transfer Among Survivors of Critical COVID-19 and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Observational Study Using Modified Poisson Regression From Japan.

Jun Kawabata, Kotaro Kuwaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jun KawabataAdvanced Emergency Medical Service Center, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, JPN.
Kotaro KuwakiPublic Health, Kurume University, Kurume, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Research on nursing care needs (NCNs) for critically ill patients at discharge is scarce. This study aimed to quantify and compare NCNs at discharge between patients with severe COVID-19 and septic shock and to identify factors associated with higher NCNs. Methodology We retrospectively analyzed data from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 1, 2020, and March 31, 2023, on patients requiring ventilators in the intensive care unit (ICU). We excluded patients who were <15 years old, died during hospitalization, had multiple admissions during the study period, had incomplete medical records, and received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Differences in patient condition and nursing care implementation between COVID-19 and septic shock patients were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. A modified Poisson regression model was used to assess factors associated with NCNs scores of 7 or more. Covariates included continuous variables such as age, duration of ventilation, length of stay, sex, use of sleeping medications, use of delirium medications, presence of risky behavior at admission, use of continuous hemofiltration, and comorbidities including cerebrovascular diseases. A categorical variable classified patients into the following three groups: COVID-19, septic shock, or other diseases. Results Among 438 ventilated patients, 33 had COVID-19, and 37 had septic shock. The Mann-Whitney U test showed no significant differences in patient condition (8 vs. 8, p = 0.34) or nursing care implementation (4.0 vs. 4.0, p = 0.72). Multivariable analysis revealed that COVID-19 was associated with a slightly higher NCNs score of ≥7 (risk ratio (RR) = 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-1.89, p = 0.018), older age (RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.00-1.02, p < 0.01), and prolonged ventilation (RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01-1.02, p < 0.01). Notably, the use of sleeping medications was associated with a lower NCNs score (RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.57-0.83, p < 0.01). Conclusions While no statistically significant differences in NCNs were found between the COVID-19 and sepsis survivor groups, those groups demonstrated higher NCNs levels upon discharge. These findings could help expedite ICU liberation for critical survivors and provide valuable insights to inform evidence-based nursing practice. Our findings suggested that NCNs use may enhance the quality of nursing care, promote further nursing research, and contribute valuable insights to critical care nursing and post-ICU patient management.

Indexed as

covid-19critical care and hospital medicineinpatient datanursing analyticsnursing care needspost-intensive care syndrome (pics)septic shockventilator use

Identifiers

PMID39703276
PMCPMC11658857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.