ArticleCureus2024
Effects of Grip Style and Contact Point on Force Production in a Tennis Forehand Groundstroke.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility of Force-Sensing Finger Assessment in Elite Fencers: A Pilot Study with Clinical Translational Potential.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern tennis forehand grip style and ball contact points have evolved to enhance power and topspin. Different grip styles and ball contacts are recommended; however, little data are available to support one over another. Through a quantitative experimental study, we sought to determine which grip style and ball contact point produced the greatest forces at static contact. The continental, eastern, and semi-western forehand groundstroke grips of 100 volunteers were evaluated. Participants stood in three defined positions and applied maximum force against a dynamometer with each grip style. The associations of force produced at contact with the grip style, age, sex, tennis experience, and handedness were evaluated using univariate and multivariate linear mixed-effects regression models separately for early, mid, and late contact, including a random effect for each participant. Force production was significantly greater with eastern grip at early, mid, and late contact than with the other two grips (p < 0.001). Force was greater at early contact with semi-western grip than with continental. Force was also significantly greater for men at early, mid, and late contact (p < 0.001). Participants using an eastern grip were able to generate more force compared to those using a continental or semi-western grip, regardless of the ball contact point. Tennis players currently using other forehand grip styles who want to maximize power production may consider transitioning to an eastern forehand grip. The results of this study may improve tennis instruction and training for beginning and novice players who lack force generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.