Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39703241›Full record

ArticleClinical case reports2024

What Do I Do if the Valve Don't Pass? Use a Snare Catheter!

Simon Berger, Nicolas Combaret, Geraud Souteyrand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simon BergerDepartment of Cardiology Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Center Clermont-Ferrand France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3577-2869
Nicolas CombaretDepartment of Cardiology Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Center, CNRS, Clermont Auvergne University Clermont-Ferrand France.
Geraud SouteyrandDepartment of Cardiology Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Center, CNRS, Clermont Auvergne University Clermont-Ferrand France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a case of a complex transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) complicated by severe calcifications, which prevented the delivery system from advancing through the aortic valve. To address this challenge, we employed an innovative solution using a Snare catheter. This approach enabled stabilization and guidance of the delivery system, facilitating the crossing of the calcified obstruction and the successful completion of the procedure. This case highlights the utility of the Snare catheter as a complementary technique to overcome anatomical challenges in complex TAVI procedures.

Indexed as

calcificationsevere aortic stenosissnare techniquetranscutaneous aortic valve replacementvalve replacement

Identifiers

PMID39703241
PMCPMC11656374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.