Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39703174›Full record

ArticleJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2025

Cadê o Kauê? Co-design and acceptability testing of a chat-story aimed at enhancing youth participation in the promotion of mental health in Brazil.

Gabriela Pavarini, Sheila Giardini Murta, Josimar Antônio de Alcântara Mendes, Felipe Rodrigues Siston, Rafa Ribeiro Alves de Souza, Rafaela de Oliveira da Cunha, Julyana Alves Ferreira, Victor Hugo de Lima de Santos, Brenda Thallys Rocha Seabra, Talk2U and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. 'Co-Production Is Caring': Young People's Reflections on Responsible and Dialogic Co-Production in Youth Mental Health.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gabriela PavariniEthox Centre, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5574-4021
Sheila Giardini MurtaDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Josimar Antônio de Alcântara MendesDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Felipe Rodrigues SistonDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Rafa Ribeiro Alves de SouzaEngajadamente Youth Collaborative Group, Brasília, Brazil.
Rafaela de Oliveira da CunhaEngajadamente Youth Collaborative Group, Brasília, Brazil.
Julyana Alves FerreiraEngajadamente Youth Collaborative Group, Brasília, Brazil.
Victor Hugo de Lima de SantosEngajadamente Youth Collaborative Group, Brasília, Brazil.
Brenda Thallys Rocha SeabraEngajadamente Youth Collaborative Group, Brasília, Brazil.
Talk2UTalk2U, Health-Tech Company, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ilina SinghDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

British Academy YF/190240National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre NIHR203316NDPH Intermediate Fellowship, Oxford Population HealthWellcome TrustWellcome Trust CSR00650/HQ00.01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescent mental health is vital for public health, yet many interventions fail to recognise adolescents as proactive community contributors. This paper discusses the co-design and acceptability testing of a chat-story intervention to enhance Brazilian adolescents' participation in the promotion of mental health in their peer communities. We specifically highlight the iterative process of co-creating this intervention with community stakeholders.

methodsThe co-design was led by researchers, a youth collaborative group, and health-tech experts. Part 1 included quantitative (n = 1,768) and qualitative (n = 46) studies with Brazilian adolescents aged 15-18 for priority-setting. Part 2 involved co-creation and technical production, with input from youth advisors (n = 24), school staff (n = 11), and policy experts (n = 3). In Part 3, the chat-story was user tested (n = 32). Parts 4 and 5 assessed acceptability through a qualitative study in schools (n = 138) and initial efficacy during an online campaign (n = 795).

resultsParticipants aspired to support their peers' mental health in schools, both one-to-one and collectively, but felt unprepared. This informed the chat-story's goal of enhancing peer support and collective action skills. Themes identified during Part 1, such as prejudice and academic pressure, were woven into the narrative to raise awareness of the social determinants of mental health, drawing from real-life stories. In the final story, players search for their missing best friend at school, uncovering his anxiety struggles and practicing skills such as empathic listening and partnership building. A manual for teachers was collaboratively designed for use within school settings, supplementing direct-to-user online applications. Acceptability testing showed participants found the tool authentic and user-friendly. Online users perceived the tool as preparing and motivating them to offer peer support and engage in collective action.

conclusionsThe immersive co-creation model, enriched by input from key stakeholders, yielded a relevant and well-received intervention for Brazilian adolescents. Co-designed creative tools like chat-stories hold promise as digital mental health tools, fostering awareness, critical reflection, and inspiring adolescents to drive positive social change.

Indexed as

Health PromotionMental HealthPatient Acceptance of Health CarePeer GroupAdolescentBrazilFemaleHumansMaleQualitative Researchadolescentschatbotcivic engagementco‐designco‐productiondigital interventionsempowermentgamingmental healthpeer supportstorytellinguser‐centred designvideo gameswellbeingyouth participation

Identifiers

PMID39703174
PMCPMC12018289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.