ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
Navigating a Fine Balance: Point-Mutant Cheater Viruses Disrupt the Viral Replication Cycle.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cheater viruses cannot replicate on their own yet replicate faster than the wild type (WT) when the 2 viruses coinfect the same cell. Cheaters must possess dual genetic features: a defect, which leads to their inability to infect cells on their own, and a selective advantage over WT during coinfection. Previously, we have discovered 2 point-mutant cheaters of the MS2 bacteriophage. Here, we set out to discover the possible repertoire of cheater MS2 viruses by performing experimental evolution at a very high multiplicity of infection. Our results revealed a third point-mutant cheater that arose in 8 biological replicas. Each of the 3 primary cheaters disrupts the fine balance necessary for phage replication, in different ways that create a defect + advantage. We found that over time, the point-mutant cheaters accumulate additional secondary mutations, which alter other stages of the viral replication cycle, complementing the disruptions created by the original cheater. Intriguingly, cheater and secondary mutations almost always reside in very close proximity on the genome. This region encodes for multiple functions: overlapping reading frames as well as overlapping RNA structures critical for transitioning from one stage to another in the viral replication cycle. This region of overlap explains the dual functions of cheaters, as one mutation can have pleiotropic effects. Overall, these findings underscore how viruses, whose dense genomes often have overlapping functions, can easily evolve point-mutant cheaters, and how cheaters can evolve to alter the intricate balance of the viral replication cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.