Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39703035›Full record

ArticleFEBS open bio2025

Evaluating frailty scores across experimental groups in rodent models: bridging physical and cognitive domains.

Aleksandra Mladenovic, Smilja Pracer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEBS open bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aleksandra MladenovicDepartment for Neurobiology, Institute for Biological Research 'Sinisa Stankovic', National Institute of Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9011-5634
Smilja PracerDepartment for Neurobiology, Institute for Biological Research 'Sinisa Stankovic', National Institute of Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7155-4914

Funding

Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia 451-03-66/2024-03/200007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frailty, a reversible clinical geriatric syndrome, impairs the ability to maintain homeostasis, leading to severe consequences such as hospitalization and death. Cognitive frailty, characterized by the co-occurrence of physical frailty and cognitive impairment, has garnered increasing attention in recent years. Preclinical models, especially rodent studies, are essential for understanding frailty and developing interventions to mitigate associated conditions. Traditionally, animal studies have focused solely on physical frailty. We have pioneered the inclusion of cognitive parameters by developing a novel physical-cognitive frailty score (FS) in animal research, in order to assess the effectiveness of anti-aging interventions. Here, we provide a detailed example of the FS calculation at the group level, which can serve as a guide for other studies. This dual-focus approach also helps in understanding how physical frailty and cognitive impairment interact to exacerbate adverse health outcomes and provides an opportunity to evaluate potential interventions that target both physical and cognitive dimensions of frailty more reliably.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive DysfunctionFrailtyAgingAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceRatsRodentiabehaviorcognitionfrailtyrodent

Identifiers

PMID39703035
PMCPMC11961374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.