Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702980›Full record

ArticleClinical endocrinology2025

How Does Thyroid Hormone Profile Differ on and Off Replacement Treatment?

Adrian H Heald, Lakdasa D Premawardhana, Peter N Taylor, Adam Baker, Nadia Chaudhury, Anthony A Fryer, Onyebuchi E Okosieme, Colin M Dayan, Mike Stedman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adrian H HealdThe School of Medicine and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Lakdasa D PremawardhanaThyroid Research Group, Systems Immunity Research Institute, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0931-3700
Peter N TaylorThyroid Research Group, Systems Immunity Research Institute, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3436-422X
Adam BakerDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
Nadia ChaudhuryWorcester College, Oxford, UK.
Anthony A FryerSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Onyebuchi E OkosiemeThyroid Research Group, Systems Immunity Research Institute, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2221-992X
Colin M DayanThyroid Research Group, Systems Immunity Research Institute, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Mike StedmanRes Consortium, Andover, UK.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere continues to be much discussion around optimisation of thyroid hormone status in hypothyroid individuals. We here looked the way that free T4(FT4) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) related to each other in a large laboratory sample of people who underwent a thyroid function test (TFT), split between those on levothyroxine replacement (monitoring test) and those who underwent a test to check for thyroid hormone imbalance (diagnostic test; not on levothyroxine).

methodsTFT test (FT4/TSH) results were extracted from the Salford Royal Hospital Laboratory Information Management System during 2009-2012. This was a single site study. Requests includes a tick box for 'on levothyroxine' (yes or no). To minimise comorbidity effects, only samples taken in General Practices were used. For untreated patients only those who had single tests results were used; for treated patients, the median value across all their results was used. Cluster analysis considered an ellipse with centre on median values for log (TSH) and FT4 and the vertex based on 5% and 95% percentile values of both. The percentage of patients falling outside the ellipse boundary was considered for both treated and untreated populations.

resultsThe total data set included 290,000 tests on 130,000 individuals. After filtering, FT4/TSH results were used from 12,006 (F 9231/M 2775; age < 60 5850/age ≥ 60 6567) treated patients with 43,846 test results. These were compared to the single results for 43,394 untreated patients (F 24,386/M19,008; age < 60 32,537/age ≥ 60 10,857). Cluster analysis showed for untreated patients, median values for TSH and FT4 were 1.8 mU/L and 15.5 pmol/L, respectively, with 24% of patient results falling outside the untreated 5%/95% percentiles. For treated patients, the median TSH was 2.3 mU/L (+30% vs. untreated) and FT4 was 18.9 pmol/L (+22% vs. untreated), with 22% of treated patients falling outside the treated 5%/95% percentiles. When considered against the untreated limits, 68% of treated results fell outside (split male 63%, female 70% and age < 60 67%, Age ≥ 60 64%).

conclusionThe current treatment regimens of either low or high dose levothyroxine are not delivering the expected laboratory TFT profiles, with significant numbers of treated patients being well outside the expected values: both TSH and FT4 being significantly higher. This effect appears to be more prevalent in women than men.

Indexed as

Hormone Replacement TherapyHypothyroidismThyroid HormonesThyrotropinThyroxineAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedThyroid Function TestsYoung AdultThyroid HormonesThyrotropinThyroxinethyroid hormone profiletreated hypothyroidismuntreated and euthyroid individuals

Identifiers

PMID39702980
PMCPMC11874186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.