ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2024
Selective Pressure Influences Inter-Biome Dispersal in the Assembly of Saline Microbial Communities.
Article in Environmental microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Selection and dispersal are the primary processes influencing community assembly at both global and regional scales. Although the effectiveness of dispersal is often examined within the same biome, microscopic organisms demonstrate the capability to colonise and thrive across different biomes. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between (i) aquatic, (ii) sedimentary and (iii) aerial microbial communities, and how local selective pressures influence the potential impact of inter-biome dispersal, focusing on the salinity gradient stress over time in ephemeral saline lakes. Our taxonomic ordination analyses revealed that the three communities were distinctly segregated yet interconnected by shared populations. Organisms prevalent across the three biomes exhibited cosmopolitan behaviour based on global databases, indicating an inherent ability to cross biome boundaries. Cosmopolitan groups dominated the planktonic community at lower salinities but gradually diminished as salinity increased, resulting in communities dominated by aquatic specialists with more restricted environmental distributions. The aerial community was primarily composed of generalists, although airborne halophiles were also identified, suggesting long-range dispersal as a source of colonisers in isolated extremophile environments. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of the dynamic interplay between dispersal and selective pressures on community assembly across biomes, highlighting the significance of aerial microbiota in remote colonisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.