Trial reportJournal of foot and ankle research2024
Efficacy of heel lifts for insertional Achilles tendinopathy (LIFTIT): A randomised feasibility trial.
Trial report in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesInsertional Achilles tendinopathy is a common and disabling condition. This trial aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the efficacy of heel lifts compared to a sham intervention for reducing pain intensity associated with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.
methodsTwenty-six people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy were randomised to either the heel lift group or sham intervention group. Outcome measures were obtained at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was feasibility, evaluated according to demand (recruitment rate and conversion rate), acceptability, adherence, adverse events and retention. Limited efficacy testing was conducted on secondary outcome measures including pain intensity, function, physical activity, health-related quality of life, use of co-interventions and global rating of change.
resultsBetween August 25, 2023, and April 7, 2024, we recruited and tested 26 participants (aged 28-65 years, mean [SD] 51 [8]). The pre-determined thresholds were met for demand, acceptability, adherence, retention, pain intensity, function, quality of life and global rating of change and partly met for adverse events, physical activity and use of co-interventions. Between 47 and 241, participants will be needed for a fully powered randomised trial.
conclusionIn its current form, a randomised trial of heel lifts compared to a sham intervention is feasible. However, future triallists may need to consider strategies to manage the risk of adverse events and plan to adjust the analyses to account for the use of co-interventions.
trial registrationACTRN12623000721606.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.