Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702825›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

PreyTouch: a touchscreen-based closed-loop system for studying predator-prey interactions.

Regev Eyal, Nitzan Albeck, Mark Shein-Idelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Regev EyalSchool of Neurobiology, Biochemistry, and Biophysics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Nitzan AlbeckSchool of Neurobiology, Biochemistry, and Biophysics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Mark Shein-IdelsonSchool of Neurobiology, Biochemistry, and Biophysics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. sheinmark@tauex.tau.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0001-8132-2826

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 949838Israel Science Foundation (ISF) 1133/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to catch prey is crucial for survival and reproduction and is subject to strong natural selection across predators. Prey capture demands the orchestrated activation of multiple brain regions and the interplay between sensory processing, decision-making, and motor execution. These factors, together with the ubiquity of prey capture across species makes it appealing for comparative studies across neuroscience and ecology. However, despite recent technological advances, experimental approaches for studying natural behaviors such as prey catch are lagging behind. To bridge this gap, we created PreyTouch-a novel approach for performing prey capture experiments that incorporate flexible prey control, accurate monitoring of predator touchscreen strikes and automated rewarding. Further, its real-time processing enables coupling predator movement and prey dynamics for studying predator-prey interactions. Finally, PreyTouch is optimized for automated long-term experiments featuring a web UI for remote control and monitoring. We successfully validated PreyTouch by conducting long-term prey capture experiments on the lizard Pogona vitticeps. This revealed the existence of prey preferences, complex prey attack patterns, and fast learning of prey dynamics. PreyTouch's unique features and the importance of studying prey capture behavior make it a valuable platform for connecting natural behavior with cognitive studies across various species and disciplines.

Indexed as

Predatory BehaviorAnimalsLizards

Identifiers

PMID39702825
PMCPMC11659303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.