ArticleBiotechnology letters2024
Comparative proteomic analysis to annotate the structural association of the hypothetical proteins from the conserved domain of P. aeruginosa as novel vaccine candidates.
Article in Biotechnology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPseudomonas aeruginosa, identified as an ESKAPE pathogen, contributes to severe clinical diseases worldwide and despite its prevalence an effective vaccine or treatment remains elusive. Numerous computational methods are being employed to target hypothetical proteins (HPs). Presently, no studies have predicted multi-epitope vaccines for these HPs.
resultsTotally, 877 HPs from P. aeruginosa were included in the study and the data showcased here illustrate a methodical approach to prioritize the proteome by employing diverse comparative proteomics. The study employed physicochemical property assessment and conserved domain analysis to identify stable and immunologically pertinent proteins for epitope prediction. The VaxiJen2.0 antigenicity assessment aided in epitope selection, contributing to the foundational steps in vaccine development by predicting T-cell and B-cell epitopes. Potential T and B cell epitopes with high antigenicity, non-toxic categorization, and robust binding affinities were identified in the investigation. The periplasmic HP WP_132813935.1 was predicted as conserved, stable, and soluble. The T-cell peptide RTSMRALAY and the B-cell peptide MPVYLYLM were predicted to be probable non-allergen and demonstrated strong binding with MHC class I allele HLA-C*03:03.
conclusionsThis research provides a comprehensive approach to predict T and B cell epitopes for conditions associated with P. aeruginosa, offering a candidate pool for tailored vaccine development. However, the efficacy of these epitopes in vaccine development necessitates clinical validation and testing for confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39702823What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.