Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702746›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2024

The representational instability in the generalization of fear learning.

Kenny Yu, Wolf Vanpaemel, Francis Tuerlinckx, Jonas Zaman

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kenny YuKU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. kenny.yu@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0665-9354
Wolf VanpaemelKU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5855-3885
Francis TuerlinckxKU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1775-7654
Jonas ZamanKU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2218-3018

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Research Foundation Flanders) 12P8623NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Research Foundation Flanders) G079520N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perception and perceptual memory play crucial roles in fear generalization, yet their dynamic interaction remains understudied. This research (N = 80) explored their relationship through a classical differential conditioning experiment. Results revealed that while fear context perception fluctuates over time with a drift effect, perceptual memory remains stable, creating a disjunction between the two systems. Surprisingly, this disjunction does not significantly impact fear generalization behavior. Although most participants demonstrated generalization aligned with perceptual rather than physical stimulus distances, incorporating perceptual memory data into perceptual distance calculations did not enhance model performance. This suggests a potential shift in the mapping of the perceptual memory component of fear context, occurring alongside perceptual dynamics. Overall, this work provides evidence for understanding fear generalization behavior through different stimulus representational processes. Such mechanistic investigations can enhance our understanding of how individuals behave when facing threats and potentially aid in developing mechanism-specific diagnoses and treatments.

Identifiers

PMID39702746
PMCPMC11659557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.