ReviewJournal of behavioral medicine2025
Psychosocial predictors of short-term glucose among people with diabetes: A narrative review.
Review in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Type 1 and type 2 diabetes are metabolic disorders that require one to manage one's blood glucose levels on a daily basis through a series of behaviorally complex tasks. Research shows that psychosocial factors, including mood, stress, and social relationships, have a significant influence on one's ability to maintain these disease management routines and achieve healthy blood glucose levels. However, researchers have typically approached these questions from a between-person perspective. Here, we argue for greater consideration of short-term, within-person links of psychosocial factors-including mood, stress, and social interactions-to glucose outcomes. Drawing from existing social and health psychology theories, we put forth an organizing theoretical framework describing how psychosocial experiences may operate on glucose outcomes over subsequent hours. We then review the small but burgeoning literature of intensive longitudinal studies that have examined the short-term effects of negative affect, positive affect, stress, and social interactions on glucose outcomes. Findings showed somewhat stronger links for negative affect and stress compared to positive affect and social interactions, but studies varied greatly in their methodologies, making direct comparisons challenging. A number of findings, particularly in the social interaction literature, depended on dispositional or contextual factors, further complicating interpretation. There was little investigation of the mechanistic pathways that may connect psychosocial factors to glucose outcomes, and few studies conducted lagged analyses to probe the directionality of these links. We conclude by proposing best practices for future research that will address the key weaknesses in the extant literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.