ArticleThe AAPS journal2024
PK/PD Evaluation of Antibody-Drug Conjugates with Enhanced Immune Effector Functions.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vivo Auto-tuning of Antibody-Drug Conjugate Delivery to Maximize Efficacy Using High-Avidity, Low-Affinity Antibodies.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2026Article
- A translational physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for MMAE-based antibody-drug conjugates.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2025Article
- A Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Study of Protosappanoside D, a Component Derived fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimizing the interaction between antibody (mAb)-based therapeutics and immune effector functions (EFs) offers opportunities to improve the therapeutic window of these molecules. However, the role of EFs in antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) efficacy and toxicity remains unknown, with limited studies that have investigated how modulation of EF affects the pharmacology of ADCs. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of EF modulation on ADC efficacy using trastuzumab-vc-MMAE as a model ADC. A series of ADCs with enhanced or eradicated EF were synthesized through Fc engineering of the antibody. Cell-based assays confirmed that the alteration of EFs in ADCs did not change their in vitro potency, and the conjugation of vc-MMAE did not alter the trends in EFs modulation. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies of Fc engineered ADCs were conducted in a syngeneic mouse system. The enhancement of EFs led to lower systemic exposure, faster clearance, and potentially enhanced tissue distribution and accumulation of ADCs. ADCs with enhanced EFs demonstrated improved efficacy in the syngeneic mouse tumor model, which was quantitatively confirmed by PK/PD modeling. The model indicated that EF enhancement was synergistic for ADC efficacy, whereas the complete removal of EF was less than additive. Our study suggests that developing ADCs with enhanced EF may improve the therapeutic effectiveness of ADCs, although the effect of this modification on ADC safety and extrapolation of our findings to other ADCs necessitates further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39702683What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.