Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702626›Full record

SynthesisTranslational psychiatry2024

The disappointment centre of the brain gets exciting: a systematic review of habenula dysfunction in depression.

Sarah Cameron, Katrina Weston-Green, Kelly A Newell

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Translational psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reply to Tarchini et al.: Evidence for a GPR156 role in central stress responses in addition to its inner-ear function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah CameronSchool of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences and Molecular Horizons, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-0349-8880
Katrina Weston-GreenSchool of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences and Molecular Horizons, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4521-8463
Kelly A NewellSchool of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences and Molecular Horizons, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia. knewell@uow.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1245-5585

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe habenula is an epithalamic brain structure that acts as a neuroanatomical hub connecting the limbic forebrain to the major monoamine centres. Abnormal habenula activity is increasingly implicated in depression, with a surge in publications on this topic in the last 5 years. Direct activation of the habenula is sufficient to induce a depressive phenotype in rodents, suggesting a causative role in depression. However, the molecular basis of habenula dysfunction in depression remains elusive and it is unclear how the preclinical advancements translate to the clinical field.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The two search terms depress* and habenula* were applied across Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed databases. Studies eligible for inclusion must have examined the habenula in clinical cases of depression or preclinical models of depression and compared their measures to an appropriate control.

resultsPreclinical studies (n = 63) measured markers of habenula activity (n = 16) and neuronal firing (n = 22), largely implicating habenula hyperactivity in depression. Neurotransmission was briefly explored (n = 15), suggesting imbalances within excitatory and inhibitory habenula signalling. Additional preclinical studies reported neuroconnectivity (n = 1), inflammatory (n = 3), genomic (n = 3) and circadian rhythm (n = 3) abnormalities. Seven preclinical studies (11%) included both males and females. From these, 5 studies (71%) reported a significant difference between the sexes in at least one habenula measure taken. Clinical studies (n = 24) reported abnormalities in habenula connectivity (n = 15), volume (n = 6) and molecular markers (n = 3). Clinical studies generally included male and female subjects (n = 16), however, few of these studies examined sex as a biological variable (n = 6).

conclusionsBoth preclinical and clinical evidence suggest the habenula is disrupted in depression. However, there are opportunities for sex-specific analyses across both areas. Preclinical evidence consistently suggests habenula hyperactivity as a primary driver for the development of depressive symptoms. Clinical studies support gross habenula abnormalities such as altered activation, connectivity, and volume, with emerging evidence of blood brain barrier dysfunction, however, progress is limited by a lack of detailed molecular analyses and limited imaging resolution.

Indexed as

HabenulaAnimalsDepressionDepressive DisorderHumans

Identifiers

PMID39702626
PMCPMC11659325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.