Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702577›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2025

Acute dose-dependent effects and self-guided titration of continuous N,N-dimethyltryptamine infusions in a double-blind placebo-controlled study in healthy participants.

Livio Erne, Severin B Vogt, Lorenz Müller, Albiona Nuraj, Anna Becker, Aaron Klaiber, Melani Zuparic, Nimmy Varghese, Anne Eckert, Deborah Rudin and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Registered Clinical Trials of Ayahuasca and DMT: A Scoping Review.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Livio Erne *Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Severin B Vogt *Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Lorenz MüllerClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9155-1080
Albiona NurajClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Anna BeckerClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5308-7945
Aaron KlaiberClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Melani ZuparicClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Nimmy VarghesePsychiatric University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Anne EckertPsychiatric University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9341-3669
Deborah RudinClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Dino LuethiClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0874-4875
Matthias E LiechtiClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. matthias.liechti@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1765-9659

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 32003B_185111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) is a serotonergic psychedelic that is known for its short-lasting effects when administered intravenously. Several studies have investigated the administration of intravenous boluses or combinations of a bolus and a subsequent continuous infusion. However, data on dose-dependent acute effects and pharmacokinetics of continuous DMT infusions are lacking. We used a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover design in 22 healthy participants (11 women, 11 men) who received placebo and DMT (0.6, 1.2, 1.8, and 2.4 mg/min) over an infusion duration of 120 min. We also tested a self-guided titration scheme that allowed participants to adjust the DMT dose rate at prespecified time points to achieve their desired level of subjective effects. Outcome measures included subjective effects, autonomic effects, adverse effects, plasma hormone concentrations, and pharmacokinetics up to 3 h after starting the infusion. DMT infusions exhibited dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and rapidly induced dose-dependent subjective effects that reached a plateau after 30 min. A ceiling effect was observed for "good drug effect" at 1.8 mg/min. The 2.4 mg/min dose of DMT induced greater anxious ego dissolution than the 1.8 mg/min dose and induced significant anxiety compared with placebo. We observed moderate acute tolerance to acute effects of DMT. In the self-guided titration session, the participants opted for moderate to strong psychedelic effects, comparable in intensity to the 1.8 mg/min DMT dose rate in the randomized dosing sessions. These results may assist with dose finding for future DMT research and demonstrate that acute subjective effects of DMT can be rapidly adjusted through dose titration.

Indexed as

HallucinogensN,N-DimethyltryptamineAdultCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleSelf AdministrationYoung AdultHallucinogensN,N-Dimethyltryptamine

Identifiers

PMID39702577
PMCPMC12032411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.