ArticleBehavior research methods2024
A modular machine learning tool for holistic and fine-grained behavioral analysis.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated Quantification of Affect Synchrony: Links to Autism Risk and Social Communication in Infancy.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence techniques offer promising avenues for exploring human body features from videos, yet no freely accessible tool has reliably provided holistic and fine-grained behavioral analyses to date. To address this, we developed a machine learning tool based on a two-level approach: a first lower-level processing using computer vision for extracting fine-grained and comprehensive behavioral features such as skeleton or facial points, gaze, and action units; a second level of machine learning classification coupled with explainability providing modularity, to determine which behavioral features are triggered by specific environments. To validate our tool, we filmed 16 participants across six conditions, varying according to the presence of a person ("Pers"), a sound ("Snd"), or silence ("Rest"), and according to emotional levels using self-referential ("Self") and control ("Ctrl") stimuli. We demonstrated the effectiveness of our approach by extracting and correcting behavior from videos using two computer vision software (OpenPose and OpenFace) and by training two algorithms (XGBoost and long short-term memory [LSTM]) to differentiate between experimental conditions. High classification rates were achieved for "Pers" conditions versus "Snd" or "Rest" (AUC = 0.8-0.9), with explainability revealing actions units and gaze as key features. Additionally, moderate classification rates were attained for "Snd" versus "Rest" (AUC = 0.7), attributed to action units, limbs and head points, as well as for "Self" versus "Ctrl" (AUC = 0.7-0.8), due to facial points. These findings were consistent with a more conventional hypothesis-driven approach. Overall, our study suggests that our tool is well suited for holistic and fine-grained behavioral analysis and offers modularity for extension into more complex naturalistic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39702505What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.