Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702492›Full record

ArticleCommunications chemistry2024

Odor prediction of whiskies based on their molecular composition.

Satnam Singh, Doris Schicker, Helen Haug, Tilman Sauerwald, Andreas T Grasskamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Satnam Singh *Department of Sensory Analytics and Technologies, Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Freising, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4229-0554
Doris Schicker *Department of Sensory Analytics and Technologies, Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Freising, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2188-1532
Helen HaugDepartment of Sensory Analytics and Technologies, Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Freising, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5428-2048
Tilman SauerwaldDepartment of Sensory Analytics and Technologies, Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Freising, Germany.
Andreas T GrasskampDepartment of Sensory Analytics and Technologies, Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Freising, Germany. andreas.grasskamp@ivv.fraunhofer.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5895-6529

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aroma compositions are usually complex mixtures of odor-active compounds exhibiting diverse molecular structures. Due to chemical interactions of these compounds in the olfactory system, assessing or even predicting the olfactory quality of such mixtures is a difficult task, not only for statistical models, but even for trained assessors. Here, we combine fast automated analytical assessment tools with human sensory data of 11 experienced panelists and machine learning algorithms. Using 16 previously analyzed whisky samples (American or Scotch origin), we apply the linear classifier OWSum to distinguish the samples based on their detected molecules and to gain insights into the key molecular structure characteristics and odor descriptors for sample type. Moreover, we use OWSum and a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture to classify the five most relevant odor attributes of each sample and predict their sensory scores with promising accuracies (up to F1: 0.71, MCC: 0.68, ROCAUC: 0.78). The predictions outperform the inter-panelist agreement and thus demonstrate previously impossible data-driven sensory assessment in mixtures.

Identifiers

PMID39702492
PMCPMC11659623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.