ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2024
Clinical study of short-term spinal cord stimulation for herpes zoster-associated pain.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Efficacy of Short-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation for Subacute Zoster-Associated Pain: A Three-Group Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
- Comparative outcomes of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: peripheral nerve versus spinal cord lesions.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Home-Based Remote Programming versus Inpatient Programming After Short-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation for Herpes Zoster Neuralgia: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Short-term spinal cord stimulation vs. pulsed radiofrequency in acute/subacute herpes zoster pain.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Impacts of Pain Characteristics on the Outcomes of Short-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Post-Herpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Self-Controlled Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- A Short Review and Update on Epidemiology, Treatment, and Management of Herpes Zoster (Shingles) Infection.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- Maladaptive reorganization of mediodorsal thalamus as a central mechanism in neuropathic pain-related sleep disorders.Military Medical Research · 2026Article
- Comparative efficacy and safety of pulsed radiofrequency versus spinal cord stimulation in thoracic herpes zoster pain: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative efficacy of short-term spinal cord stimulation and pulsed radiofrequency in zoster-associated pain: a stratified database study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- The efficacy and prognosis analysis of short-term spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of zoster-associated pain: a retrospective study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Central effects of short-term spinal cord stimulation in postherpetic neuralgia: a longitudinal fMRI and DTI study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundZoster-associated neuralgia refers to neuropathic pain from herpes zoster, which can persist as postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Preventing the progression to chronic PHN is crucial, yet optimal interventions is still not clear.
objectivesThis study evaluates the efficacy of short-term spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) in patients with subacute and chronic PHN.
methodsA clinical study involved 135 patients with herpes zoster-associated pain (HZAP), divided into two groups: Experimental group which received short-term spinal cord stimulation therapy, and Control group which received conventional medical treatment and nerve block therapy. Pain intensity, sleep quality, anxiety and depression and quality of life were assessed at baseline and at 2 weeks, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month post-treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified factors associated with treatment efficacy.
resultsAt 1-month follow-up, the experimental group showed significantly higher efficacy in pain reduction (P < 0.01). Higher Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (β = 0.093, P = 0.004) and PHQ-9 scores (β = 0.065, P = 0.031) before treatment were associated with better outcomes. At 3 months, longer disease duration (β = 0.103, P = 0.008) and higher Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores (β = 0.114, P = 0.002) correlated with better efficacy, while higher Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores were negatively correlated (β = - 0.023, P = 0.036). Although as follow-up time increases, the significant superiority of efficacy gradually shrinks compared with nerve block therapy at 6-12 months, the tSCS group still had better effects in improving sleep quality, anxiety and depression symptoms, and quality of life.
conclusionsShort-term spinal cord stimulation is a safe and effective short-term treatment for HZAP, offering faster and more effective pain relief and quality of life improvement compared to nerve block therapy. However, there are challenges in maintaining the long-term effects of tSCS. Further studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.