ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2024
Pre-alerts from critical care ambulances to trauma centers: a quantitative survey of trauma team leaders in Ontario, Canada.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chinese expert consensus on the prehospital management of major trauma.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPre-alerts from paramedics to trauma centers are important for ensuring the highest quality of trauma care. Despite this, there is a paucity of data to support best practices in trauma pre-alert notifications. Within the trauma system of Ontario, Canada, the provincial critical care transport organization, Ornge, provides pre-alerts to major trauma centers, but standardization is currently lacking. This study examined the satisfaction of trauma team leaders' (TTLs) satisfaction with current trauma pre-alerts and their preferences for logistics, content, and structure.
methodsThis was a quantitative survey of TTLs at adult and pediatric trauma centers across Ontario, Canada. Recruitment was through email to trauma directors, with follow-up efforts to target low-response sites to achieve good geographical representation. The survey was completed online and contained a combination of single or multiple-choice questions, Likert scales and free text options.
resultsIn total, 79 TTLs from adult and pediatric lead trauma centers across Ontario responded to the survey, which took place over a 120-day period. The survey achieved good geographical representation. Given the current processes, TTLs describe moderate satisfaction with room for improvement (median score 3, IQR 3-4 on a 5-point Likert scale). Their overall preference was for timely and direct communication, with some concerns about multiple channels of communication around logistics. Most TTLs agreed on the important and less important content details found in common standardized framework tools. For structure, 28/79 TTLs strongly preferred the cognitive aid ATMIST, 13/79 preferred IMIST-AMBO, and 8/79 preferred MIST or SBAR as the most useful.
conclusionsThere is room for improvement through standardizing communication and streamlined pre-alert channels. Some disagreements exist between TTLs, particularly regarding logistics. Further research should examine TTL satisfaction after implementing the change in the pre-alert notification framework, which can address localized issues through stakeholder meetings with individual TTLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.