ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2024
Over-the-counter procured emergency contraception among undergraduate students in a public University in Ghana.
Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- TELEHEALTH and digital health platforms in promoting access to sexual reproductive health self care among youth: A case of rocket health services in Uganda.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency Contraception (EC) is more popular among young people today, yet, there is little research on Over-the-counter procured EC among undergraduate students in African universities. This study's primary goal is to fill that gap.
methodsThis was an exploratory-cross-sequential study conducted in a public university in Ghana, using 145 purposively sampled sexually active undergraduate students. A structured questionnaire and in-depth interview guide designed by the author were used for data collection during the University's 2021/2022 Academic year. The questionnaire was administered online via students' social media platforms. In contrast, four group discussions were held with 20 female participants (5 each from levels 100, 200, 300, and 400). Quantitative data were analyzed using Stata Version 14.0 to generate the Median, Standard deviation, Chi-square, and Fisher Exact Test scores, Whilst Content analysis was done with the qualitative data to generate verbal quotes.
resultsThere is demand and abuse of ECs among the students studied with about 99% usage to prevent pregnancy. Friends (81%) played a significant role in providing information about ECs to most participants (96%). About 80% of participants have used an EC at least once during the academic year and upon recommendation by friends (44%) and partners (39%). The most preferred ECs were Postinor-2 (61%) and Lydia post-pills (38%). Pharmacies on campus are the major (86%) suppliers at a cost between ghs5 and ghs15 cedis respectively. There were relationships between gender and choice of ECs (p = 0.001); age group and choice of ECs (p = 0.02); marital status and choice of ECs (p < 0.0001) as well as employment status of students and choice of ECs (p = 0.003). The qualitative findings provided relevant justifications for students' EC choices, sources, dosage, frequency, and motivations for use. The EC pills were taken routinely and soon after sexual intercourse sometimes overdosed for a perceived efficacy to prevent failure, regulate menses, or as an abortifacient. Male partners played a critical role in procuring and supervising the intake soon after sexual intercourse.
conclusionThere is a high demand, usage, and general abuse of over-the-counter procured ECs among undergraduate students in the study area. These findings suggest that sexually active students are concerned about pregnancy prevention and need health education programs on modern contraceptive methods to prevent unwanted pregnancy and possible STIs. From unprotected sex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.