ArticleClinical epigenetics2024
Distinct microbiome dysbiosis and epigenetic anomaly in esophageal adenocarcinoma and its underlying Barrett's esophagus.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The ageing holobiont: crosstalk between telomere dynamics, oxidative stress and the gut microbiome.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
- Pathogenesis of Barrett's Esophagus: Evolving and Emerging Mechanisms.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026Review
- Intestinal and esophageal microbiota in esophageal cancer development and treatment.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- The Evolving Paradigm of Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma: Current Insights, Emerging Therapies, and Future Directions.Journal of cancer science and clinical therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interaction between host genotoxic changes and mucosa-associated microbiome (MAM) dysbiosis may have a role in various digestive cancers. We investigated MAM in Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) progression sequence and its association with host genotoxic changes. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed in three different groups of biopsies from nonneoplastic BE from patients without cancer (N, normal group; n = 47) and with EAC (ADJ, adjacent group; n = 27). Endoscopic biopsies were also obtained from EAC tissues (T, tumor group; n = 22). Results were correlated with TP53 mutation, telomere length and DNA methylation of candidate genes (N33, DPYS, SLC16A12, miR124A3 and miR34bc). Genome-wide DNA methylation examined by reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) was available for 32 samples (n = 12 for N, n = 12 for ADJ and n = 22 for T groups). Lower microbial alpha diversity measures were observed in ADJ/T groups relative to N group and associated with higher mean Z score DNA methylation of candidate genes. Specific genera (n = 16) with significant change between ADJ/T groups relative to N group occurred mostly in ADJ group (13/16) and half of them (8/16) were associated with DNA methylation status. Integrated MAM and genome-wide methylation analysis demonstrated that hyper-methylated sites, associated with lower alpha diversity measures dominantly occurred within near the transcription start site, codifying genes were involved in metabolic processes. Our result shows that microbial dysbiosis in EAC mostly occurs in adjacent BE and such dysbiosis was associated with DNA methylation status, offering support for a pathogenic role of interaction between host genotoxic changes and MAM in this tumor type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.