ArticleArthritis research & therapy2024
Poor prognostic factors for relapse of interstitial lung disease in microscopic polyangiitis: the Japanese multicentre REVEAL cohort study.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Biomarkers on Fibrotic Lung Diseases Associated with Usual Interstitial Pneumonia.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
- Long-term efficacy of rituximab versus intravenous cyclophosphamide for severe ANCA-associated vasculitis in multicenter REVEAL cohort study.Journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated poor prognostic factors for the relapse of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) after remission induction therapy.
methodsWe enrolled patients diagnosed with MPA complicated by ILD according to the Chapel Hill Consensus definition from 2001 to 2023 in multiple institutions in the REVEAL cohort. All patients who were treated with immunosuppressive therapy were followed up, and those who relapsed with ILD were extracted in this study. We explored the risk factors for predicting ILD relapse in patients with MPA-ILD by comparing the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings and treatments between the relapsed and non-relapsed groups on admission.
resultsOf 243 patients with MPA, 134 (55.1%) with MPA-ILD were enrolled. Among them, 28 (20.9%) relapsed during a mean follow-up of 4.2 years. The initial serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and surfactant protein-D (SP-D) levels and the prevalence of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern were significantly higher in the relapsed group. The biomarkers were also risk factors for relapse in multivariate Cox regression analysis. The best cut-off values of KL-6, SP-D for predicting ILD relapse were 430 U/mL and 89.5 ng/mL, respectively. We created prediction models based on the best cut-off values for KL-6, SP-D, and the presence of the UIP pattern (KSU model). The 10-year relapse rate was significantly different among patients with MPA-ILD stratified by the number of risk factors based on the KSU model. A higher relapse rate was associated with higher all-cause mortality.
conclusionsThe initial serum high KL-6 and SP-D levels and the prevalence of the UIP pattern were associated with ILD relapse in patients with MPA-ILD. Our multicentre cohort study indicated that the KSU model, which consists of KL-6 ≥ 430 U/mL, SP-D ≥ 89.5 ng/mL, and the presence of the UIP pattern, is a useful predictor of ILD relapse in patients with MPA after immunosuppressive therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.