ArticleHealth research policy and systems2024
The Australian clinical trial landscape: Perceptions of rural, regional and remote health service capacity and capability.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strengthening Rural Health With N-of-1 Trials and Single-Case Experimental Designs.The Australian journal of rural health · 2026Article
- Implementation science and the clinical trial workforce: A national needs assessment of training and practice.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- The Future is Local: the Role of Decentralised Clinical Trials in Patients with Advanced Cancer Receiving Palliative Care.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Inequities in inflammatory bowel disease care: a Tasmanian case study with proposed solutions.Internal medicine journal · 2026Review
- Target Trial Emulation and the TARGET Guideline to Advance Rural and Remote Health Research.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
- Digital Transformation of Rural, Regional, and Remote Australian Hospitals: A Pragmatic Strategy for Introducing AI.The Australian journal of rural health · 2026Article
- Impact assessment of telehealth medical nutrition therapy for managing cardiovascular disease risk in rural and remote NSW: the Healthy Rural Hearts study.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Towards equitable cancer outcomes for rural and remote communities: reflections, lessons and recommendations.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccess to clinical trials is limited for rural, regional and remote Australians, adding to the current health inequity between rural and metropolitan populations. The Australasian Teletrial Model was developed to bring clinical trials "closer to home". In 2020, the Australian Teletrial Program was funded to expand and support the uptake of the model across six Australian states and territories. The aim of this study was to explore and describe the clinical trial landscape in Australia prior to the implementation of the Australian Teletrial Program with a particular focus on rural, regional and remote health services.
methodsThis qualitative study provides a descriptive exploration of the clinical trial landscape across rural, regional and remote Australia. Data were obtained from semi-structured interviews (n = 33) and one focus group (n = 5) involving clinical trial stakeholders between August 2022 and May 2023. Deductive then inductive thematic analysis used the broad topic areas of the interview schedule as a framework, as follows: education and training, workforce, equipment and services, clinical trial sites, participant recruitment and clinical trial approval process.
resultsThis study identified barriers that are generalizable to the Australian clinical trial landscape and those specific to the rural, regional and remote health service context. The main barriers to conducting clinical trials in rural, regional and remote areas were lack of investment and engagement on the part of health service executives, workforce limitations, inconsistent training, lack of physical infrastructure and competing clinical priorities. Despite these challenges, clinicians reported enthusiasm for conducting clinical trials, and opportunities were reported for these health services to partner with larger metropolitan/regional health services, regional universities and communities to support the growth of clinical trial capability and capacity.
conclusionsThe clinical trial landscape in Australian health services varies in terms of quality and availability of training, workforce capacity, executive support, site capability and approval processes. The Australian Teletrial Program has an immense opportunity to overcome some of the reported challenges by supporting capacity and capability building. Ultimately, however, sustainable reform to bring trials closer to home requires a collaborative approach that considers implementation strategies across all levels of the health service and government, alongside other initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.