ArticleAIDS research and therapy2024
Effect of a multimodal continuing professional development initiative on HIV testing in primary care in British Columbia, Canada.
Article in AIDS research and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMany persons are unaware of HIV infection until they present in an advanced stage of the disease. Diagnosing HIV infection in its earliest stages reduces morbidity and mortality and contributes to improved public health. Increased testing for HIV is critical for prevention, and primary care providers play an essential role in early HIV screening. However, lack of knowledge and confidence are barriers to the adoption of screening practices. Continuing professional development (CPD) may enhance greater HIV testing uptake amongst primary care providers by improving awareness and comfort. This paper aims to report on the impact of a multimodal CPD initiative to increase HIV screening and test ordering across primary care settings in British Columbia, Canada.
methodsThe 'HIV Testing Initiative in Family Practice' was designed as a multimodal education strategy to encourage family physicians to adopt routine HIV testing in their practices. The initiative encompassed a variety of core and supplementary educational activities, including interactive in-person CPD workshops, practice resources, and patient education materials. An interrupted time series study was undertaken to evaluate the effect on HIV test ordering before and after workshop participation. Participants also completed post-workshop surveys to assess satisfaction.
resultsIn total, 316 individuals participated in the core educational activities of the initiative. The number of HIV tests ordered increased significantly amongst participants following workshop participation (p < .001). HIV test ordering increased for both rural and urban providers with no significant difference (p = .075) on the number of tests ordered between these groups. Participants were very satisfied with workshop participation, with an overall mean satisfaction rating of 4.78 (out of 5) and reported high satisfaction with the format (4.64 out of 5) and interactivity (4.76 out of 5) features across the workshops. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that the introduction of a multimodal CPD intervention may have effected change in family physicians' HIV testing practices. The HIV testing rates of physicians who had participated in CPD workshops increased significantly, and participant evaluation data indicated a greater understanding of the rationale for routine HIV testing, as well as an increase in comfort with recommending HIV tests to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.