Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702317›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2024

Artificial intelligence tools for engagement prediction in neuromotor disorder patients during rehabilitation.

Simone Costantini, Anna Falivene, Mattia Chiappini, Giorgia Malerba, Carla Dei, Silvia Bellazzecca, Fabio A Storm, Giuseppe Andreoni, Emilia Ambrosini, Emilia Biffi

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06993389 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

AI-based Model for Rehabilitation Engagement and Motor Performance Evaluation in Pediatric Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorIRCCS Eugenio MedeaRan2025 to 2025Enrolled31ConditionsNeuromotor ImpairmentsArmsInapplicable
NCT07664033 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

AI-based Model for Rehabilitation Engagement and Motor Performance Evaluation in Pediatric Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS Eugenio MedeaRan2026 to 2026Enrolled15ConditionsNeuromotor ImpairmentsArmsArtificial Intelligence Model for Rehabilitation Engagement Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Simone Costantini *Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy. simone.costantini@polimi.it.
Anna Falivene *Scientific Institute, IRCCS "E. Medea", Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Mattia ChiappiniScientific Institute, IRCCS "E. Medea", Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Giorgia MalerbaScientific Institute, IRCCS "E. Medea", Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Carla DeiScientific Institute, IRCCS "E. Medea", Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Silvia BellazzeccaScientific Institute, IRCCS "E. Medea", Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Fabio A StormScientific Institute, IRCCS "E. Medea", Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Giuseppe AndreoniScientific Institute, IRCCS "E. Medea", Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Emilia AmbrosiniDepartment of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Emilia BiffiScientific Institute, IRCCS "E. Medea", Bosisio Parini, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobot-Assisted Gait Rehabilitation (RAGR) is an established clinical practice to encourage neuroplasticity in patients with neuromotor disorders. Nevertheless, tasks repetition imposed by robots may induce boredom, affecting clinical outcomes. Thus, quantitative assessment of engagement towards rehabilitation using physiological data and subjective evaluations is increasingly becoming vital. This study aimed at methodologically exploring the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms applied to structured datasets made of heart rate variability (HRV) and electrodermal activity (EDA) features to predict the level of patient engagement during RAGR.

methodsThe study recruited 46 subjects (38 underage, 10.3 ± 4.0 years old; 8 adults, 43.0 ± 19.0 years old) with neuromotor impairments, who underwent 15 to 20 RAGR sessions with Lokomat. During 2 or 3 of these sessions, ad hoc questionnaires were administered to both patients and therapists to investigate their perception of a patient's engagement state. Their outcomes were used to build two engagement classification targets: self-perceived and therapist-perceived, both composed of three levels: "Underchallenged", "Minimally Challenged", and "Challenged". Patient's HRV and EDA physiological signals were processed from raw data collected with the Empatica E4 wristband, and 33 features were extracted from the conditioned signals. Performance outcomes of five different AI classifiers were compared for both classification targets. Nested k-fold cross-validation was used to deal with model selection and optimization. Finally, the effects on classifiers performance of three dataset preparation techniques, such as unimodal or bimodal approach, feature reduction, and data augmentation, were also tested.

resultsThe study found that combining HRV and EDA features into a comprehensive dataset improved the synergistic representation of engagement compared to unimodal datasets. Additionally, feature reduction did not yield any advantages, while data augmentation consistently enhanced classifiers performance. Support Vector Machine and Extreme Gradient Boosting models were found to be the most effective architectures for predicting self-perceived engagement and therapist-perceived engagement, with a macro-averaged F1 score of 95.6% and 95.4%, respectively.

conclusionThe study displayed the effectiveness of psychophysiology-based AI models in predicting rehabilitation engagement, thus promoting their practical application for personalized care and improved clinical health outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHeart RateAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsChildFemaleGait Disorders, NeurologicGalvanic Skin ResponseHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurological RehabilitationRoboticsYoung AdultClassificationEngagementExtreme Gradient BoostingK-Nearest NeighborsNeural NetworkPsychophysiological signalsRandom forestRobot-Assisted Gait RehabilitationSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID39702317
PMCPMC11657850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.