ArticlePlant methods2024
Systematic investigation and validation of peanut genetic transformation via the pollen tube injection method.
Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Tissue Culture-Free Genetic Engineering and Genome Editing of Peanut.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Review
- Genomic-Encoded Mitovirus RdRp Is Required for Embryo Development and Maintaining Mitochondrial Dynamics inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic transformation is a pivotal approach in plant genetic engineering. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important oil and cash crop, but the stable genetic transformation of peanut is still difficult and inefficient. Recently, the pollen tube injection pathway has been shown to be effective for the genetic transformation of peanut. However, the poor reproducibility of this pathway is still controversial. In this study, the appropriate time and location of injection, along with transgenic screening, were systematically investigated in the pollen tube mediated peanut genetic transformation. Our findings revealed that Agrobacterium injections could be conducted within a time window of two to three hours preceding and succeeding the blooming process. Among the various selective markers evaluated, the Basta screening emerged as the most expedient, followed closely by the DsRed visual screening. According to resistance screening and molecular identification, the average transformation efficiency was 2.6% in the heritable transgenic progenies, which was more likely affected by individual operation by style cavity injection. Furthermore, the use of synergistic FT artificially regulated the blooming of peanuts under indoor conditions, facilitating operations involving keel petal injection and ultimately enhancing the genetic transformation efficiency. Thus, our study systematically validated the feasibility of peanut genetic transformation through an optimized pollen-tube injection technique without tissue culture, potentially guiding future advancements in peanut engineering and molecular breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.