Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702279›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2024

Systematic investigation and validation of peanut genetic transformation via the pollen tube injection method.

Chen Huang, Chen Yang, Huifang Yang, Yadi Gong, Xiaomeng Li, Lexin Li, Ling Li, Xu Liu, Xiaoyun Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chen Huang *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Chen Yang *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Huifang YangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Yadi GongGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Xiaomeng LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Lexin LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Ling LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Xu LiuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany & State Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China. liuxu@scbg.ac.cn.
Xiaoyun LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Plant Development, School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China. xiaoyunli@scnu.edu.cn.

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2024A1515010953Key Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province 2022B1111230001National Natural Science Foundation of China 32071924National Natural Science Foundation of China 32171920Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou E3330900-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic transformation is a pivotal approach in plant genetic engineering. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important oil and cash crop, but the stable genetic transformation of peanut is still difficult and inefficient. Recently, the pollen tube injection pathway has been shown to be effective for the genetic transformation of peanut. However, the poor reproducibility of this pathway is still controversial. In this study, the appropriate time and location of injection, along with transgenic screening, were systematically investigated in the pollen tube mediated peanut genetic transformation. Our findings revealed that Agrobacterium injections could be conducted within a time window of two to three hours preceding and succeeding the blooming process. Among the various selective markers evaluated, the Basta screening emerged as the most expedient, followed closely by the DsRed visual screening. According to resistance screening and molecular identification, the average transformation efficiency was 2.6% in the heritable transgenic progenies, which was more likely affected by individual operation by style cavity injection. Furthermore, the use of synergistic FT artificially regulated the blooming of peanuts under indoor conditions, facilitating operations involving keel petal injection and ultimately enhancing the genetic transformation efficiency. Thus, our study systematically validated the feasibility of peanut genetic transformation through an optimized pollen-tube injection technique without tissue culture, potentially guiding future advancements in peanut engineering and molecular breeding programs.

Indexed as

Genetic transformationNon-tissue culture transformationPeanutPollen-tube injectionTransformation efficiency

Identifiers

PMID39702279
PMCPMC11658161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.