ArticleArthritis research & therapy2024
Quantitative
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- CXCR4-targeted PET/CT in early systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: a prospective proof-of-concept study of in vivo inflammatory activity.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Beyond Conventional Imaging: Nuclear Imaging in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Pilot study ofRespiratory research · 2025Article
- GLUT and FAPα as molecular markers for interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis.Respiratory research · 2025Article
- Imaging in animal models: bridging experimental findings and human pathophysiology.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Methodology Development for Investigating Pathophysiological [Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Advances in clinical research on interstitial lung disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to assess the quantitative uptake of
methodsA prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted, involving 15 patients with SSc-ILD, 5 patients with SSc without ILD, and 7 controls without SSc.
results
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.