ReviewBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts2024
Strategies and tools to construct stable and efficient artificial coculture systems as biosynthetic platforms for biomass conversion.
Review in Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intelligent Plasmonic Bio-Holoelectrochemical Systems: A Testable Architecture for Light-Programmed Microbial Electrochemistry.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2026Review
- Microfluidics to Meet Antibiotic Resistance: A Growing Research Frontier.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Gas-Phase Integration of Trophically Distinct Microbial Cultures for Net-Reduced COMicrobial biotechnology · 2025Article
- Biosynthesis of biobased products from lignocellulose using filamentous fungi-integrated microbial consortia.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2025Review
- Article
- Genome-Wide Identification and Phylogenetic Characterization of the FTIP Gene Family in Maize (Genes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inspired by the natural symbiotic relationships between diverse microbial members, researchers recently focused on modifying microbial chassis to create artificial coculture systems using synthetic biology tools. An increasing number of scientists are now exploring these systems as innovative biosynthetic platforms for biomass conversion. While significant advancements have been achieved, challenges remain in maintaining the stability and productivity of these systems. Sustaining an optimal population ratio over a long time period and balancing anabolism and catabolism during cultivation have proven difficult. Key issues, such as competitive or antagonistic relationships between microbial members, as well as metabolic imbalances and maladaptation, are critical factors affecting the stability and productivity of artificial coculture systems. In this article, we critically review current strategies and methods for improving the stability and productivity of these systems, with a focus on recent progress in biomass conversion. We also provide insights into future research directions, laying the groundwork for further development of artificial coculture biosynthetic platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.