ArticleBMC surgery2024
Role of surgical vaginoscopy through no-touch hysteroscope in the treatment of female reproductive polyps.
Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical application of hysteroscopic decidual polypectomy in pregnant women.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Case Report: Endoscopic-guided electrocautery ablation of a vaginal hemorrhagic lesion in a dog.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Vaginoscopic polypectomy for cervical polyps during pregnancy: an analysis of safety and influencing factors for pregnancy outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and influencing factors of adverse outcomes following clinical pregnancy after laparoscopic tubal anastomosis.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Vaginoscopy approach with Mechanical Tissue Removal System for AUB inPediatric Aplastic Anemia: a case report.BMC surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe study aims to investigate the application of surgical vaginoscopy via a no-touch hysteroscopic approach for the management of female genital polyps. The primary objective is to assess the feasibility of this technique in treating intrauterine pathologies in both pregnant and non-pregnant women.
methodsA total of forty-six patients diagnosed with genital polyps underwent operative vaginoscopy at a university-affiliated hospital between April 1, 2017 and May 31, 2023. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the collected data, encompassing patient complaints, clinical presentations, surgical outcomes, and pathological diagnoses. Additionally, the success rate of the vaginoscopic procedures was determined.
resultsForty-six patients with an average age of 33.0 ± 8.8 years were included in this study. Among them, 25 were non-pregnant (3 with and 22 without a sexual history). The most common clinical manifestation was irregular vaginal bleeding (11/25, 44%) followed by conscious vaginal protrusion (10/25, 40%). Among the 21 pregnant patients, the main symptom was irregular vaginal bleeding during pregnancy (100%). The postoperative pathological diagnoses included 11 endometrial polyps, 33 cervical polyps, 1 multiple vaginal polyps, and 1 vaginal stump polyps. The coincidence rate between the intraoperative vaginoscopic diagnosis and postoperative pathological diagnosis was 100%. Among the non-pregnant patients, 11 were diagnosed with endometrial polyps, with an average length of 2.2 ± 1.2 cm, 1 patient had vaginal residual polyps after total hysterectomy, with a polyp length of 0.3-0.7 cm, and 1 had multiple vaginal polyps, with a length of 0.5-3 cm. Twelve patients had cervical polyps with an average length of 3.4 ± 1.2 cm. Twenty-one pregnant patients were diagnosed with cervical polyps, the average length of 2.4 ± 1.4 cm. All patients successfully underwent vaginoscopic surgery, for an average surgical duration of 23.5 ± 14.9 min, a bleeding volume of 1-10 mL(4.5 ± 3.4 mL), and an average hospitalisation of 2.7 ± 1.3 days. Throughout the surgical procedures, no complications were encountered, including water intoxication or uterine perforation. Postoperatively, no patients experienced discomforts such as fever or moderate to severe abdominal pain. Furthermore, all non-pregnant women were monitored for a two-month period following surgery, and throughout this interval, there were no reports of abnormal vaginal bleeding, unusual vaginal discharge, or abdominal pain. None of the 21 pregnant women experienced abnormal vaginal bleeding after the surgery. Nineteen of them delivered at full term, and one underwent caesarean delivery at 31 weeks owing to placental abruption. All the newborns had Apgar scores of 10, 10, and 10, and one had a miscarriage at 18 weeks of gestation.
conclusionVaginoscopic surgery through no-touch hysteroscope represents a minimally invasive and highly effective method for addressing female reproductive tract polyps. This approach holds significant clinical value, particularly in the management of cervical polyps during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.