ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2024
Prognostic significance of CEA reduction rate in patients with abnormally high preoperative CEA levels who underwent surgery for lung cancer.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Upfront Surgery for c-Stage IIIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with an Abnormally High Preoperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level: A Case Report.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
- A novel nomogram for predicting mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this research was to investigates the prognostic importance of change in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (particularly abnormal high concentration) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between before and after surgery.
methodsThe study involved 68 patients with NSCLC ( preoperative CEA value ≥ 10 ng/ml) who received curative operation from 2012 to 2020. Preoperative and postoperative serum CEA levels, CEA reduction, and other clinicopathological factors were determined on medical records. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to calculate cut-off levels for prognostic markers. Multivariate analyses with a Cox proportional hazards regression model were performed to identify Independent prognostic variables.
resultsThe optimal cut-off was value for the CEA reduction rate was 77.3%. The area under the curve for the CEA reduction rate was greater compared with those for preoperative and postoperative CEA levels. The Kaplan-Meier method revealed a significantly worse prognosis in the low CEA reduction rate group versus the high CEA reduction rate group regarding overall survival (OS) (p = 0.002). In the multivariate analysis, the CEA reduction rate (hazard ratio: 3.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-8.51, p = 0.011) was identified as an independent and exclusive prognostic marker for OS.
conclusionsIn NSCLC, which is characterized by high preoperative CEA levels, the CEA reduction rate after surgery is a useful prognostic factor. Importantly, it is a more powerful indicator for OS compared with postoperative CEA levels. Further, large-sample-size cohort studies focusing on this issue are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.