Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702193›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2024

Quality assurance of hyperspectral imaging systems for neural network supported plant phenotyping.

Justus Detring, Abel Barreto, Anne-Katrin Mahlein, Stefan Paulus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justus DetringInstitute of Sugar Beet Research, Göttingen, Niedersachsen, 37079, Germany. Detring@ifz-goettingen.de.
Abel BarretoInstitute of Sugar Beet Research, Göttingen, Niedersachsen, 37079, Germany.
Anne-Katrin MahleinInstitute of Sugar Beet Research, Göttingen, Niedersachsen, 37079, Germany.
Stefan PaulusInstitute of Sugar Beet Research, Göttingen, Niedersachsen, 37079, Germany.

Funding

Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung FKZ 28DE104A18Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft FKZ 28DE104A18Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC-2070 - 390732324European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development EIP AGRI - 276032540210329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis research proposes an easy to apply quality assurance pipeline for hyperspectral imaging (HSI) systems used for plant phenotyping. Furthermore, a concept for the analysis of quality assured hyperspectral images to investigate plant disease progress is proposed. The quality assurance was applied to a handheld line scanning HSI-system consisting of evaluating spatial and spectral quality parameters as well as the integrated illumination. To test the spatial accuracy at different working distances, the sine-wave-based spatial frequency response (s-SFR) was analysed. The spectral accuracy was assessed by calculating the correlation of calibration-material measurements between the HSI-system and a non-imaging spectrometer. Additionally, different illumination systems were evaluated by analysing the spectral response of sugar beet canopies. As a use case, time series HSI measurements of sugar beet plants infested with Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) were performed to estimate the disease severity using convolutional neural network (CNN) supported data analysis.

resultsThe measurements of the calibration material were highly correlated with those of the non-imaging spectrometer (r>0.99). The resolution limit was narrowly missed at each of the tested working distances. Slight sharpness differences within individual images could be detected. The use of the integrated LED illumination for HSI can cause a distortion of the spectral response at 677nm and 752nm. The performance for CLS diseased pixel detection of the established CNN was sufficient to estimate a reliable disease severity progression from quality assured hyperspectral measurements with external illumination.

conclusionThe quality assurance pipeline was successfully applied to evaluate a handheld HSI-system. The s-SFR analysis is a valuable method for assessing the spatial accuracy of HSI-systems. Comparing measurements between HSI-systems and a non-imaging spectrometer can provide reliable results on the spectral accuracy of the tested system. This research emphasizes the importance of evenly distributed diffuse illumination for HSI. Although the tested system showed shortcomings in image resolution, sharpness, and illumination, the high spectral accuracy of the tested HSI-system, supported by external illumination, enabled the establishment of a neural network-based concept to determine the severity and progression of CLS. The data driven quality assurance pipeline can be easily applied to any other HSI-system to ensure high quality HSI.

Indexed as

Computer visionIlluminationImage resolutionImage sharpnessMachine learningPlant diseasesRemote sensingSpatial accuracySpectral accuracy

Identifiers

PMID39702193
PMCPMC11658308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.