ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Optimizing post-surgical outcomes: unveiling the importance of patient-reported outcomes with insights from the schulthess local shoulder arthroplasty registry.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The moderating role of negative affect on pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have undergone shoulder arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Correction: Optimizing post-surgical outcomes: unveiling the importance of patient-reported outcomes with insights from the schulthess local shoulder arthroplasty registry.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe establishment of clinical registries is essential for the comprehensive evaluation of surgical outcomes. In 2006, the Schulthess Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry (SAR) was launched to systematically assess safety, implant longevity, functional outcomes, pain levels, quality of life, and patient satisfaction in individuals undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. This paper aims to outline the registry data and demonstrate how it is leveraged to improve clinical outcomes. Additionally, we provide guidance for organizations currently collecting or planning to collect similar data.
participantsOur SAR systematically records adult patients' data undergoing either anatomic or reverse shoulder joint replacement at the Schulthess Clinic. Both primary and revision surgeries are comprehensively documented within the registry. CURRENT OUTCOMES: From March 2006 to December 2023, the SAR included 98% of eligible operations. A total of 2301 patients were recruited, accounting for 3576 operations and 14,487 person-years of follow-up. At baseline, the mean age was 71 (range: 20-95), with 65% being female patients. The most prevalent indication was cuff tear arthropathy (46%), and the mean preoperative Constant Score was (31 ± 15). Notably, functional recovery peaked at 12 months postoperatively, displaying no clinically significant deterioration during the initial ten follow-up years in the overall cohort (including both primary arthroplasty and revisions). The registry has been instrumental in addressing various clinical and methodological inquiries, focusing particularly on comparing different implant configurations and surgical techniques to optimize functional recovery. Additionally, SAR data played a pivotal role in substantiating the clinical significance and reliability of radiological monitoring for cortical bone resorption, scapular notching, and glenoid component loosening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.