ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
An overview of patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with proximal femoral nail fixation using important criteria.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Orthopedic Outcomes of Proximal Femoral Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fractures and Predictive Value of Pre-operative Glycemic Status, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio: A Prospective Study.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Impact of limited intramedullary reaming versus unreamed technique in short proximal femoral nail anti-rotation for intertrochanteric fractures: a matched retrospective study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
- Determinants of mortality following intertrochanteric fractures, comorbidities versus reduction quality: retrospective cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Independent Risk Factors for Lag Screw Cut-Out: The Role of Open Reduction in Intertrochanteric Fracture Fixation With the Proximal Femoral Nail.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Inferior Screw Referenced Calcar Tip Apex Distance as the Most Accurate Predictor of Mechanical Cut Out in Dual-Screw Proximal Femoral Nails.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Investigation of the Medium- and Long-Term Results of a Pioneering Method in the Treatment of Geriatric Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: Osteosynthesis Using the WALANT Technique.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The RESCUE Technique: A Mnemonic Acronym to Enhance Outcomes in Nail Fixation of Extracapsular Hip Fractures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Should We Reconstruct Coronal Plane Fractures in Multifragmentary Pertrochanteric Fractures? A Randomized Controlled Trial.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to assess important criteria, including osteoporosis, fracture type, implant position within the bone, fracture reduction, and radiographic union, in patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with proximal femoral nail (PFN) fixation and to show their effect on clinical outcomes.
methodsPFN fixation was applied in 73 patients (41 females, 32 males; mean age: 64.5 ± 6.2). The T score, fracture type according to the AO Foundation and Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA), implant-related complications (IRCs), Harris hip score (HHS), Jensen social function (JSF) score, and Parker-Palmer mobility score (PPMS), postoperative reduction classification, screw position according to the Cleveland zone, Radiographic Union Scale for the Hip (RUSH) score, and tip-apex distance (TAD) were recorded.
resultsMost screws were in central-central (n = 42) and inferior-central (n = 11) positions. IRCs were seen mostly in cases of screws placed in peripheral zones (n = 10) and were not observed in almost any patient with a TAD ≤ 25 mm (n = 52) (p < 0.001). Most of the patients with acceptable or good fracture reduction did not have IRCs (n = 11 and 50, respectively) (p < 0.001). Half of type 3A1 (n = 13) and most type 3A2 (n = 20) fractures showed radiographic union at 3 months, and most type 3A3 (n = 9) fractures showed radiographic union at 5 months (p < 0.05). At 12 months, type 3A2 fractures had the highest HHS (79.2 ± 5.3) and PPMS (3.9 ± 1.5), while type 3A3 fractures had the lowest HHS (70.3 ± 4.6) and PPMS (0.6 ± 2.8) (p < 0.05). At 12 and 24 months, type 3A3 fractures had higher JSF scores (2.8 ± 0.4 and 3.5 ± 0.5, respectively); at 3 months, type 3A1 fractures had higher JSF scores (3.1 ± 0.3) (p < 0.05). The radiographic bone union time was prolonged in patients with a T score ≤ -2.5 standard deviation (SD) (p < 0.05). The HHS and PPMS increased while the RUSH score, considered as the radiographic union, was going towards the 4th month and decreased after the 4th month (p < 0.05).
conclusionsConsidering the criteria (osteoporosis, fracture type, implant position within the bone, fracture reduction, and radiographic union) examined in this study, satisfactory results can be obtained with PFN fixation in the treatment of patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.