Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702168›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Women's experience of body weight management during and post-pregnancy: a mixed methods approach.

Rachel Nolan, Alison M Gallagher, Alyson J Hill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel NolanNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Ulster University, Cromore Road, Co. Londonderry Northern Ireland, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK.
Alison M GallagherNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Ulster University, Cromore Road, Co. Londonderry Northern Ireland, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK.
Alyson J HillNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Ulster University, Cromore Road, Co. Londonderry Northern Ireland, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK. aj.hill@ulster.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGaining excessive weight during pregnancy has been linked with adverse effects including increased risk of caesarean delivery and postpartum weight retention. Despite these recognised risks, currently no UK/Ireland gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines exist, women are not routinely weighed throughout pregnancy and consequently, women's understanding of the importance of weight management during, and post-pregnancy remains poor. The present study explored factors influencing weight change during and post-pregnancy and identified potential opportunities that could help women manage weight during these periods.

methodsWomen aged 18-45 years-old who had an uncomplicated pregnancy within the last 3 years were invited to complete an online questionnaire (n = 108) regarding their experience of changes in body weight during and post-pregnancy. Follow on focus groups (n = 13 women) were conducted online within the same population to delve deeper into the topic, the sessions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and data subjected to directive content analysis based on the socio-ecological model.

resultsRespondents reported in the online questionnaire, they did not receive enough information around weight management during (81.5%) and post-pregnancy (86.1%). Focus group qualitative data identified barriers to managing weight at each level of the ecological model, at the intrapersonal (e.g., changes in diet), interpersonal (e.g., conflicting advice), environment and society (e.g., COVID-19 pandemic), and institutional and policy (e.g., system failing) levels. Potential strategies to help manage weight were also identified, at the intrapersonal (e.g., need for further information), interpersonal (e.g., support groups), environment and society (e.g., messaging), and institutional and policy (e.g., further follow-up care) levels.

conclusionsMothers report receiving insufficient information around weight management, with barriers identified at each level of the ecological model. Highlighting that support and change is needed on multiple levels both during and post-pregnancy, with potential strategies identified, which could potentially inform future studies.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsGestational Weight GainPostpartum PeriodAdolescentAdultBody Weight MaintenanceCOVID-19FemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBarrierGestational weight gainPost-pregnancyPregnancyWeight management

Identifiers

PMID39702168
PMCPMC11660891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.