Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Acute effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on hamstring flexibility via fascial chain.
Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05750550 (Acute Effect of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Hamstring Flexibility Via Fascial Chain), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Acute Effect of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Hamstring Flexibility Via Fascial Chain
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSoft tissue techniques are frequently used to treat musculoskeletal disorders. Releasing the muscles through intervention from remote areas is especially important in cases where the muscles are sensitive, inaccessible or cannot be positioned appropriately. This study aimed to examine the effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) on hamstring flexibility via the fascial chain.
methods35 healthy individuals were included in the study. Straight leg raise (SLR) and popliteal angle (PA) measurements were performed to measure hamstring flexibility. IASTM was applied to the triceps surae muscle and plantar fascia on the non-dominant sides of the participants. The non-dominant legs of the individuals constituted the intervention group, while no intervention was applied to their dominant legs, designated as the control group.
resultsEach group significantly differed in the SLR and PA before and after intervention (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). There was no difference in SLR and PA between groups at the beginning and end (p > 0.05). There was no difference between the groups regarding the SLR and PA measurement changes from baseline to post-intervention (p = 0.583, p = 0.892).
conclusionsAccording to the current study results, a single session of IASTM applied to remote areas does not increase hamstring flexibility.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05750550, Date: 19/02/2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.