Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702120›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Mobilizing community engagement for crisis response: lessons learned from a COVID-19 mass vaccination clinic in Cobourg, Ontario, Canada.

Crystal Gaudet, Emily Field, Sayra Cristancho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Crystal GaudetCentre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada. cgaudet5@uwo.ca.
Emily Field *Centre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Sayra Cristancho *Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunities have an important role to play in disaster and emergency planning and response. Yet community members are not typically engaged in official planning activities, including plans for mass immunization clinics during infectious disease emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This qualitative study explores one case of a community driven effort to implement a COVID-19 mass vaccination clinic in Cobourg, Ontario, Canada. Operational between mid-March 2021 and late February 2022, the Cobourg Community Centre (CCC) clinic involved 600 community volunteers, and at its peak completed approximately 700 vaccinations a day. The development and operation of the clinic was largely grassroots, spearheaded by local non-profits and volunteers. Drawing on insights from the various actors involved, this study seeks to understand the factors that made this collaborative effort a success.

methodsSemi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted between September 2022 and July 2023 with 34 individuals involved in coordinating and operating the CCC mass vaccination clinic including volunteer community members, members of local community organizations and businesses, public health unit and hospital staff and city employees. Data was analyzed utilizing an inductive thematic analysis.

resultsFour major themes were identified that contributed to the clinic's success and enabled the team's ability to navigate challenges including, a collaborative model, leveraging community knowledge and networks, flexibility and autonomy, and volunteers as an asset.

conclusionThe findings of this study indicate the importance of community engagement in strengthening emergency planning and response for future public health emergencies.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationCOVID-19Mass VaccinationQualitative ResearchCOVID-19 VaccinesDisaster PlanningFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleOntarioSARS-CoV-2VolunteersCOVID-19 VaccinesCommunity engagementCOVID-19 mass vaccinationEmergency and disaster managementVolunteers

Identifiers

PMID39702120
PMCPMC11660807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.