ArticleBMC pediatrics2024
Pediatric providers' views on participating in an HPV Vaccine Quality Improvement Intervention: a qualitative analysis.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV), a common sexually transmitted infection in the US, contributes to oropharyngeal and urogenital cancers. To improve HPV vaccine uptake, quality improvement (QI) interventions that address barriers to vaccination in primary care may help. This study aims to understand pediatric primary care providers' (PCP) perspectives on participating in an HPV QI intervention that utilized practice facilitation to improve HPV vaccine uptake in pediatric primary care clinics.
methodsParticipants were pediatric PCPs whose clinics completed a QI intervention that utilized practice facilitation led by an outside facilitator. One PCP from each practice completed a 15-min semi-structured exit interview. The interview guide contained questions about PCPs' experiences during the intervention, skills learned, and thoughts on the use of practice facilitation. Transcribed interviews were analyzed with consensual inductive and deductive techniques.
resultsTen participants completed the interview. PCPs had a median experience of 13 years (range: 0-20) in practice, most were female (8/10), white (8/10), and non-Hispanic (9/10). PCPs reported positive experiences and the intervention encouraged them to investigate their current and target vaccination rates more thoroughly. Frequently mentioned practice-wide changes included consistent messaging among all PCPs and staff in a clinic which also extended to other aspects of their care. PCPs liked facilitation and thought that it motivated change. Although they appreciated the flexibility of virtual facilitation meetings with the practice facilitator, they recommended less frequent sessions, focusing some meetings on HPV misinformation, and more support during the intervention (e.g., analyzing data in the context of the practice's outcomes, communication between participating practices).
conclusionPCPs viewed the facilitation HPV intervention positively. Areas that would improve the intervention include addressing the timing and duration of facilitation sessions, communication strategies, and logistical support (e.g., evidence-based resources for patient education, technological support for data analysis).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.