Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702110›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2024

People living with chronic pain in Canada face difficult decisions and decisional conflict concerning their care: data from the national DECIDE-PAIN survey.

Florian Naye, France Légaré, Chloé Cachinho, Thomas Gérard, Karine Toupin-April, Maxime Sasseville, Jean-Sébastien Paquette, Annie LeBlanc, Isabelle Gaboury, Marie-Eve Poitras and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Florian NayeUniversité de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medecine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada.
France LégaréUniversité Laval, Faculty of Medecine, Department of Family and Emergency Medecine, Quebec, Canada.
Chloé CachinhoUniversité de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medecine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Thomas GérardUniversité de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medecine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Karine Toupin-AprilSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Maxime SassevilleUniversité Laval, Faculty of Nursing, Quebec, Canada.
Jean-Sébastien PaquetteUniversité Laval, Faculty of Medecine, Department of Family and Emergency Medecine, Quebec, Canada.
Annie LeBlancUniversité Laval, Faculty of Medecine, Department of Family and Emergency Medecine, Quebec, Canada.
Isabelle GabouryUniversité de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medecine and Health Sciences, Department of Family Medecine and Emergency Medecine, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Marie-Eve PoitrasUniversité de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medecine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Linda C LiUniversity of British Columbia, Department of Physical Therapy, Vancouver, Canada.
Alison M HoensUniversity of British Columbia, Department of Physical Therapy, Vancouver, Canada.
Marie-Dominique PoirierCentre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Chicoutimi, Canada.
Yannick Tousignant-LaflammeUniversité de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medecine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Simon DécaryUniversité de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medecine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada. simon.decary@usherbrooke.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShared decision-making is an imperative in chronic pain care. However, we know little about the decision-making process, especially in primary care where most chronic pain care is provided. We sought to understand decisional needs of people living with chronic pain in Canada.

methodsWe conducted a population-based cross-sectional online survey of random samples of adults living in Canada with chronic noncancer pain and registered with the Leger Marketing panel. We followed the International Association for Study of Pain definition of chronic pain (i.e., persistent or recurrent pain lasting longer than three months). We used a stratified proportional random sampling based on the population and chronic pain prevalence of each province to achieve representativeness. Based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, we collected data on difficult decisions (i.e., decision with more than one option and no clear best option) related to their chronic pain condition, the level of decisional conflict associated with the most difficult decisions (i.e., Decisional Conflict Scale), the assumed and preferred role during the decision-making process (i.e., Control Preferences Scale), and respondents' characteristics. We used descriptive quantitative analyses of survey responses.

resultsOf the 31,545 invited panellists, 2,666 met the eligibility criteria, and 1,649 respondents from the 10 Canadian provinces completed the survey. Respondents had diverse socio-demographic profiles. Mean age was 51.8 years (SD = 16.3). Half were men (51.4%), most lived in urban areas (87.8%), mean pain duration was 8.5 years (SD = 9.6), and respondents reported an average number of painful body regions of 2.3 (SD = 1.5). We observed that 96.7% of respondents faced at least one difficult decision across their care pathways. These difficult decisions were related to numerous issues from the medical consultation, diagnosis, treatment, and daily life. Almost half of respondents made their most difficult decision with a primary care physician. One third of respondents experienced a high level of clinically significant decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale score ≥ 37.5). Two-thirds of respondents self-reported having a collaborative role during their decision while three-quarters wanted this role.

conclusionsPeople living with chronic pain in Canada have unmet decisional needs and need support to make optimal decisions to manage their chronic pain. Our findings will guide future development of interventions to implement shared decision-making, especially to support primary care where discussions about difficult decisions often occur.

Indexed as

Chronic PainAdolescentAdultAgedCanadaConflict, PsychologicalCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingDecision Making, SharedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultChronic painShared decision-makingSurvey

Identifiers

PMID39702110
PMCPMC11657379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.