Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702107›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Message development for a communication campaign to support health warning labels on cigars: a qualitative study.

Chineme Enyioha, Sonia A Clark, Kristen L Jarman, Remi Philips, Selena Kleber, James F Thrasher, Adam O Goldstein

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chineme EnyiohaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 590 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. chineme_enyioha@med.unc.edu.
Sonia A ClarkLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kristen L JarmanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 590 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Remi PhilipsDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 590 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Selena KleberDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 590 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
James F ThrasherDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Adam O GoldsteinDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 590 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.

Funding

Little Cigar and Cigarillo Warnings to Reduce Tobacco-Related Cancers and DiseaseR01CA240732 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GOLDSTEIN, ADAM O · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240732NIH National Cancer Institute 3R01CA240732-03S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunication campaigns for health warning labels (HWLs) are an evidence-based strategy to reduce tobacco use. No research has examined campaign messages to support graphic HWLs for little cigars and cigarillos (LCCs).

methodsWe developed four message types for graphic LCC HWLs: (1) Explanatory (2) Testimonial (3) Inquisitive and (4) Recommendation, depicting colon, lung, and esophageal cancer. Online focus groups with Black and White young adults (18-25 years old) who reported current LCC use were conducted. Participants were shown graphic HWLs on LCCs and then four message types corresponding to the HWLs. Participants discussed persuasive communication features for each message type.

resultsThirty-six young adults who use LCCs participated. Four central themes were revealed. (1) Perceived credibility of message and messenger impacted effectiveness. (2) Personally relevant messages were emotionally engaging and made people think about their health, (3) Succinct, factual messages with new information were perceived as believable, and (4) Language perceived to be "Marketing," was deemed insincere.

conclusionsFor communication campaigns to support graphic HWLs for LCCs, messages perceived as credible, relatable, and messages that convey new information are more likely to be received positively and may increase campaign effectiveness.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsHealth PromotionProduct LabelingQualitative ResearchAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth CommunicationHumansMalePersuasive CommunicationTobacco ProductsYoung AdultCampaign messagesCigarsHealth warnings labels

Identifiers

PMID39702107
PMCPMC11660663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.