Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702102›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2024

A research protocol to study the critical time window for rehabilitation after incomplete spinal cord injury: early vs. late locomotor training.

Molly Henry, Ryan C Coxe, Alex Barry, Amanda O'Donnell, Allison Kessler, Guogen Shan, Chad Swank, W Zev Rymer, Milap S Sandhu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06176833 (Critical Time Window for Rehabilitation After Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06176833 narecruitingnot on this map

Critical Time Window for Rehabilitation After Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: Early vs Late Locomotor Training

TypeinterventionalSponsorMilap SandhuRan2024 to 2029Enrolled108ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmsBody Weight Supported Treadmill Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Molly HenryShirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E Erie St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Ryan C CoxeShirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E Erie St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Alex BarryShirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E Erie St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Amanda O'DonnellShirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E Erie St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Allison KesslerShirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E Erie St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Guogen ShanDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Chad SwankBaylor Scott and White Institute for Rehabilitation Institute, Dallas, TX, USA.
W Zev RymerShirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E Erie St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Milap S SandhuShirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E Erie St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. msandhu@sralab.org.

Funding

Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs HT9425-23-1-0418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in severe motor and sensory deficits, leading to significant disability. Preclinical studies and retrospective studies suggest that a critical window of enhanced neuroplasticity may exist immediately after SCI, during which therapeutic interventions could yield greater functional improvements. The impact of time interval since SCI on efficacy of rehabilitation has not been directly assessed and is the focus of this clinical trial. This study will compare the efficacy of high-intensity gait training, initiated at different time intervals post-injury, on walking performance in individuals with SCI. We hypothesize that early intervention will yield the greatest improvements in walking ability and community ambulation, compared to training initiated at 3 or 6 months after SCI, or standard of care. This randomized, multi-site clinical trial will enroll 108 participants with acute, traumatic SCI. Participants will be randomized to receive 20 h of high-intensity gait training that will be initiated either early (< 60 days post-SCI), sub-acute (3 months), chronic (6 months), or to a control group receiving standard of care. Primary outcomes include gait speed (10 m Walk Test) and walking endurance (6-Minute Walk Test). Secondary outcomes include daily step count via wearable sensors, lower extremity strength, and quality of life measures. Assessments will occur at baseline, pre/post-intervention, and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-SCI. This study will provide insights into the optimal timing of rehabilitation post-SCI and could have profound effects on our approach to training individuals with SCI in the healthcare setting as well as long term recovery outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06176833 was completed on 12/11/2023.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapySpinal Cord InjuriesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecovery of FunctionTime FactorsWalkingNeuroplasticitySpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID39702102
PMCPMC11657539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.