ArticleBMC neurology2024
A research protocol to study the critical time window for rehabilitation after incomplete spinal cord injury: early vs. late locomotor training.
Article in BMC neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06176833 (Critical Time Window for Rehabilitation After Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Critical Time Window for Rehabilitation After Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: Early vs Late Locomotor Training
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of aging on locomotor recovery in preclinical models of traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Exercise training promotes nerve cell repair and regeneration after spinal cord injury.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Structural brain changes in subacute spinal cord injury: an analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion tensor imaging metrics with clinical correlation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in severe motor and sensory deficits, leading to significant disability. Preclinical studies and retrospective studies suggest that a critical window of enhanced neuroplasticity may exist immediately after SCI, during which therapeutic interventions could yield greater functional improvements. The impact of time interval since SCI on efficacy of rehabilitation has not been directly assessed and is the focus of this clinical trial. This study will compare the efficacy of high-intensity gait training, initiated at different time intervals post-injury, on walking performance in individuals with SCI. We hypothesize that early intervention will yield the greatest improvements in walking ability and community ambulation, compared to training initiated at 3 or 6 months after SCI, or standard of care. This randomized, multi-site clinical trial will enroll 108 participants with acute, traumatic SCI. Participants will be randomized to receive 20 h of high-intensity gait training that will be initiated either early (< 60 days post-SCI), sub-acute (3 months), chronic (6 months), or to a control group receiving standard of care. Primary outcomes include gait speed (10 m Walk Test) and walking endurance (6-Minute Walk Test). Secondary outcomes include daily step count via wearable sensors, lower extremity strength, and quality of life measures. Assessments will occur at baseline, pre/post-intervention, and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-SCI. This study will provide insights into the optimal timing of rehabilitation post-SCI and could have profound effects on our approach to training individuals with SCI in the healthcare setting as well as long term recovery outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06176833 was completed on 12/11/2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.